Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 1;29(5):3096–3108. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11010-0

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of factors independently associated with overall survival

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
3-Year OS (%) 5-Year OS (%) p HR (95% CI) p
ASA classification

 1

 2

 3

75.9

80.6

40.8

64.3

70.8

30.6

< 0.0001

Ref.

4.5 (1.96–10.1)

0.00003
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

 No

 Yes

81.4

54.9

70.4

47.8

0.001

Ref.

2.2 (1.36–3.58)

0.002
Gastrectomy extent

 Distal

 Total

80.5

57.7

70.7

45.8

< 0.0001 ns
Lymphadenectomy extent

 D1  

 D2

60

78.4

46.5

68.9

0.006

Ref.

0.35 (0.2–0.6)

0.010
Radicality on pathology

 R0

 R1

0.003

Ref.

3.4 (1.2–10)

0.028
Margins adequacy (JGCA)

 Adequate

 Inadequate

82.7

55.5

73.2

43.3

< 0.0001

Ref.

2.35 (1.5–3.7)

0.0003
Margins adequacy (NCCN)

 Adequate

 Inadequate

81

65

72.8

51

< 0.0001
Margins adequacy (ESMO)

 Adequate

 Inadequate

78.9

73.9

71.3

62.1

0.110
Tumor location

 Upper 1/3

 Mid 1/3 

 Lower 1/3

62.2

76.9

76.9

42.7

66.1

68.4

0.006 ns
pT stage

 T1

 T2

 T3

 T4

92.8

80.8

66.4

55.8

81.1

80.8

53.7

47.4

< 0.0001 ns
pN stage

 N0

 N1

 N2

 N3a

 N3b

87.7

85.7

58.7

58.6

48.9

77.3

83.1

45.2

49,.9

19.6

< 0.0001

Ref.

0.93 (0.44–1.9)

2.2 (1.2–3.1)

3.4 (1.7–6.6)

4.8 (2.3–10.3)

0.00003
pTNM stage

 I

 II

 III

92.6

79.2

56

83.8

70.8

42.9

< 0.0001

p values < 0.05 are indicated in bold

OS overall survival, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, ASA American Society of Anesthesiology, JGCA Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, NCCN National Comprehensive Cancer Network, ESMO European Society of Medical Oncology