Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 25;9:796663. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.796663

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis for the relationship between TyG index and incident T2DM.

Hazard ratio, 95% CI and P value
Crude Model I Model II
TyG index 2.21 (1.74, 2.82) < 0.01 1.98 (1.54, 2.55) < 0.01 1.89 (1.47, 2.44) < 0.01
TyG index quintiles
Q1 1 1 1
Q2 0.88 (0.53, 1.46) 0.62 0.84 (0.51, 1.41) 0.52 0.83 (0.50, 1.39) 0.48
Q3 1.52 (0.97, 2.39) 0.07 1.39 (0.88, 2.20) 0.15 1.36 (0.86, 2.14) 0.19
Q4 1.69 (1.08, 2.62) 0.02 1.49 (0.95, 2.34) 0.08 1.44 (0.92, 2.27) 0.11
Q5 2.67 (1.77, 4.01) < 0.01 2.24 (1.47, 3.42) < 0.01 2.12 (1.39, 3.24) < 0.01
P for trend 2.35 (1.76, 3.14) < 0.01 2.05 (1.52, 2.77) < 0.01 1.97 (1.45, 2.66) < 0.01