Kim 2018.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: randomized controlled trial Study grouping: parallel group |
|
Participants |
Inclusion criteria: people who underwent TURBT for suspicion of a
bladder tumor discovered by use of cystoscopy or another imaging study Exclusion criteria: people with muscle‐invasive tumors, those undergoing radical cystectomy, those receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy, those with nonurothelial carcinoma, those who were not histologically diagnosed with cancer, those lost to follow‐up, and those who died for other reasons Number randomized: 198 (97 participants to undergo WLC TURBT and 101 participants to undergo NBI + WLC TURBT) Number analyzed by authors: 35 participants who underwent WLC TURBT and 39 participants who underwent NBI + WLC TURBT, and had follow‐up at 12 months Baseline characteristics of randomized participants who were not found to have muscle‐invasive tumor or nonurothelial carcinoma, those who did not undergo radical cystectomy during the study period, and those who did not receive chemotherapy (n = 67 comparison arm, n = 85 intervention arm) Comparator group, n = 67 participants
Intervention group, n = 85 participants
Subsequent intravesical treatment among either group: no documentation of subsequent intravesical treatment |
|
Interventions |
Comparator group: WLC TURBT Intervention group: NBI + WLC TURBT |
|
Outcomes | Number of tumors identified Disease recurrence at 12 months |
|
Funding sources | Not reported | |
Declarations of interest | The authors reported having no conflict of interest to declare. | |
Notes |
Contact with study author Date of contact attempt: 13 January 2021 Contact status: no reply to‐date |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk |
Quote: "The participants were randomly divided into the NBI
(experimental) and WLC (control) groups. Randomization was conducted by
means of a computer‐generated random sequence of numbers" Comment: Randomization was performed by a computer‐generated random sequence. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk |
Quote: "Before procedures, participants eligible for the study were
contacted by medical staff and provided with verbal and written
information." Comment: There was no mention of allocation concealment methods. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) | High risk | Comment: Personnel could not be blinded due to the nature of the intervention. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Subjective outcomes: time to disease recurrence, minor adverse event | High risk | Comment: Authors did not specify how, if any, outcome assessment blinding was achieved. The detection of disease recurrence would be affected by a lack of blinding of outcome assessors. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Time to disease recurrence | High risk | Comment: Of the 198 participants enrolled, 97 and 101 were randomized to the WLC TURBT arm and the NBI + WLC TURBT arm, respectively. Only 35 participants of the WLC TURBT arm and 39 participants of the NBI + WLC TURBT arm were included for analysis of disease recurrence at 12 months (36% and 39%, respectively). The attrition rate was greater than 20% in both arms. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: This study was registered in the Korea University Anam Hospital clinical trial center (approval number: MD13008). However, the registration protocol was not available for comparison. |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: No additional sources of potential bias were identified. |