Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 24;24(3):e28978. doi: 10.2196/28978

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies and participants.

Reference Country Jadad score Age
(years), mean (SD)/mean (IQR)/mean (range)a
Male/totala (%) Participants a, n Participant characteristics

Intervention/applicationa

Follow-up time
(months)
Outcomes
Linn et al,
2018 [48]
Netherlands 1+1+0+1=3 40.84 (14.51)
vs
45.21(17.15)
40.4 vs 51.5 52 vs 33
  • Individuals diagnosed with IBDb

  • Individuals receiving immunosuppressant or biological therapy for the first time

Telemonitoring through web or SMS text messaging vs usual care 6
  • Patient satisfaction

  • Self-efficacy

  • Medication adherence score

Ako
Beng et al, 2015 [52]
United Kingdom 2+2+0+1=5 13.9
(12.1,15.9)
vs
13.8
(11.2,15.3)
68 vs 57 44 vs 42
  • Young people (aged 8-16 years) with IBD

Teleconsulting through telephone
vs usual care
12
  • IBD-specific QoLc

  • Patient satisfaction

Bil
Grami et al, 2019d [42]
United States 2+2+0+1=5 39.7 (13)
vs 37.7 (11.6)
vs
40.2 (11)
38.5 vs 47.4 vs
36.9
75 vs 72 vs 75
  • Adults with IBD who experienced an IBD flare within 2 years prior to the trial

  • Individuals at least 18 years of age

Telemonitoring and tele-education through mobile phone with SMS text messaging vs standard care 12
  • Self-efficacy

Carlsen, 2017 [51] Denmark 1+2+1+1=5 15.1 (1.82)
vs 14.7 (2.11)
37 vs 46 27 vs 26
  • Children and adolescents, 10-17 years old, diagnosed as having IBD

Telemonitoring through web-based applications, SMS text messaging, and phone call
vs standard care
24
  • Number of clinic visits per patient

Cross et al,
2012 [39]
United States 2+2+0+1=5 41.7 (13.9)
vs
40.3 (14.4)
40 vs 32 25 vs 22
  • Adults with ulcerative colitis

Telemonitoring through home unit-server
PC provider
vs standard care
12
  • IBD-specific QoL

  • Disease activity

  • Medication adherence rate

Cross,
2018d [40]
United States 2+2+0+1=5 40.1 (13.2)
vs
36.4 (11.5)
vs
40.1 (11.7)

41.7
vs 43.1
vs 45.3
115 vs 116 vs 117
  • Adults ≥18 years of age diagnosed as having IBD who experienced at least one IBD flare in the 2 years prior to the baseline visit

Telemonitoring and tele-education through mobile phone with SMS text messaging
vs standard care
12
  • IBD-specific QoL

  • Disease activity

  • Remission rate

De Jong, 2017[47] Netherlands 2+2+0+1=5 44.0 (±14.1)
vs
44.1 (14.2)
42 vs 41 465 vs 444
  • Outpatients aged 18-75 years with IBD and without an ileoanal or ileorectal pouch anastomosis

Telemonitoring through web-based applications on a tablet or
smartphone
vs standard care
12
  • IBD-specific QoL

  • Number of outpatient visits per patient

  • Medication adherence rate

  • Self-efficacy

Del Hoyo et al, 2018
and 2019 [18,53]
Spain 2+2+0+1=5 41.32(19-66)
vs
40.91(24-60) vs
39.31(22-61)

42.9
vs 57.1
vs 57.1
21 vs 21 vs 21
  • Adults ≥18 years of age diagnosed as having IBD for at least 6 months

  • Patients who had complex IBD when immunosuppressants or biologic agents were initiated

Telemonitoring through a web-based system with smartphone apps or a tablet or through the telephone
vs standard care
6
  • IBD-specific QoL

  • Remission rate

  • Disease activity

  • Generic QoL

  • Medication adherence score and rate

  • Patient satisfaction

Elkjaer et al,
2010 [12]
Denmark
and Ireland
2+2+2+1=7 Denmark:
40 (21-69)
vs
44 (21-69)
Ireland:
41 (18-66)
vs
46 (19-65)
Denmark:
49.5 vs 31.1
Ireland:
60.8 vs 41.5
Denmark:
105 vs 106
Ireland:
51 vs 41
  • Patients aged 18-69 years who met the international diagnostic criteria for mild to moderate ulcerative colitis and were treated with 5-aminosalicylic acid

Tele-education through web-based applications vs usual care 12
  • Medication adherence rate

  • Remission rate

  • Number of clinic visits

Heida et al,
2017 [46]
Netherlands 2+2+0+1=5 15 (12-16)
vs
15 (13-17)
64 vs 45 84 vs 86
  • Patients aged 10-19 years with IBD in clinical remission at baseline

  • Patients diagnosed as having IBD more than 6 months before enrolment

Telemonitoring through web-based applications, email, and phone calls
vs usual care
13
  • IBD-specific QoL

  • Remission rate

Hunt et al,
2017 [44]
United States 0+0+0+1=1 36 (10)
(total participants)
20.6
(total participants)
32 vs 31
  • Patients at least 18 years old who self-reported a previous diagnosis of IBD, according to a medical professional’s feedback for IBD patients

  • Patients with secondary irritable bowel syndrome or with a known psychological risk factor for poor health-related QoL in chronic gastrointestinal tract disorders

Tele-education through cognitive behavioral therapy delivered online
vs usual care
1.5
  • IBD-specific QoL

  • Disease activity

  • Depression

Krier et al,
2011 [45]
United States 1+2+1+1=5 62.8 (11.5)
vs
58.5 (9.6)
87 vs 68 15 vs 19
  • Patients with IBD who underwent 57 encounters in 9 months

Teleconsulting through real-time image
vs standard care

9
  • Patient satisfaction

McCombie et al, 2020 [49] New Zealand 2+2+0+1=5 35.2 (12.4)
vs
34.3 (12.9)
52 vs 46 50 vs 50
  • Patients who were 16 years or older with confirmed IBD and who had at least 2 outpatient appointments and <3 disease flares in the past 12 months

Telemonitoring through smartphone apps vs standard care 12
  • IBD-specific QoL


McCombie et al, 2016 [50] New Zealand 2+0+0+1=3 38.3 (12.8)
vs
39.6 (11.8)
33.6
vs 38.4
113 vs 86
  • All adults with IBD aged 18 to 65 years

Tele-education through computerized cognitive behavioral therapy vs usual care 6
  • IBD-specific QoL

  • Generic QoL

  • Depression

Miloh et al,
2017 [43]
United States 1+1+1+0=3 21 vs 30
  • Children with IBD who were 8 years and older

Telemonitoring through SMS text messaging vs standard care 12
  • Medication adherence rate

  • Disease activity

  • Number of clinic visits per patient

Ozgur
Soy et al, 2019 [13]
Turkey 2+2+2+1=7 37.26(12.99)
vs
41.63(11.85)
56.7
vs 60
30 vs 30
  • Adults aged 18 years or over who were diagnosed as having IBD for 6 months

Tele-education through web-based applications on the computer or phone
vs standard care
2
  • IBD-specific QoL

  • Remission rate

Schliep et al, 2020d [41] United States 2+2+0+1=5 37.3 (11.6)
vs
39.3 (13.4)
vs
39.5 (12.0)
45 vs 40.5
vs 37.5
71 vs 74 vs 72
  • Adults who were ≥18 years of age, were diagnosed as having IBD, and experienced at least one IBD flare in the 2 years prior to the baseline visit (an increase in IBD symptoms sufficient to warrant a change in medication dose or addition of a medication)

Telemonitoring and tele-education through a mobile phone with SMS text messaging vs standard care 12
  • Depressive symptoms

  • Generic QoL

aThese items were recorded as experimental vs control group.

bIBD: inflammatory bowel disease.

cQoL: quality of life.

dThese studies came from the same clinical trial but reported different outcomes.