Table 1.
Characteristics of the included studies and participants.
| Reference | Country | Jadad score | Age (years), mean (SD)/mean (IQR)/mean (range)a |
Male/totala (%) | Participants a, n | Participant characteristics |
Intervention/applicationa |
Follow-up time (months) |
Outcomes |
| Linn et al, 2018 [48] |
Netherlands | 1+1+0+1=3 | 40.84 (14.51) vs 45.21(17.15) |
40.4 vs 51.5 | 52 vs 33 |
|
Telemonitoring through web or SMS text messaging vs usual care | 6 |
|
| Ako Beng et al, 2015 [52] |
United Kingdom | 2+2+0+1=5 | 13.9 (12.1,15.9) vs 13.8 (11.2,15.3) |
68 vs 57 | 44 vs 42 |
|
Teleconsulting through telephone vs usual care |
12 |
|
| Bil Grami et al, 2019d [42] |
United States | 2+2+0+1=5 | 39.7 (13) vs 37.7 (11.6) vs 40.2 (11) |
38.5 vs 47.4 vs 36.9 |
75 vs 72 vs 75 |
|
Telemonitoring and tele-education through mobile phone with SMS text messaging vs standard care | 12 |
|
| Carlsen, 2017 [51] | Denmark | 1+2+1+1=5 | 15.1 (1.82) vs 14.7 (2.11) |
37 vs 46 | 27 vs 26 |
|
Telemonitoring through web-based applications, SMS text messaging, and phone call vs standard care |
24 |
|
| Cross et al, 2012 [39] |
United States | 2+2+0+1=5 | 41.7 (13.9) vs 40.3 (14.4) |
40 vs 32 | 25 vs 22 |
|
Telemonitoring through home unit-server PC provider vs standard care |
12 |
|
| Cross, 2018d [40] |
United States | 2+2+0+1=5 | 40.1 (13.2) vs 36.4 (11.5) vs 40.1 (11.7) |
41.7 vs 43.1 vs 45.3 |
115 vs 116 vs 117 |
|
Telemonitoring and tele-education through mobile phone with SMS text messaging vs standard care |
12 |
|
| De Jong, 2017[47] | Netherlands | 2+2+0+1=5 | 44.0 (±14.1) vs 44.1 (14.2) |
42 vs 41 | 465 vs 444 |
|
Telemonitoring through web-based applications on a tablet or smartphone vs standard care |
12 |
|
| Del Hoyo et al, 2018 and 2019 [18,53] |
Spain | 2+2+0+1=5 | 41.32(19-66) vs 40.91(24-60) vs 39.31(22-61) |
42.9 vs 57.1 vs 57.1 |
21 vs 21 vs 21 |
|
Telemonitoring through a web-based system with smartphone apps or a tablet or through the telephone vs standard care |
6 |
|
| Elkjaer et al, 2010 [12] |
Denmark and Ireland |
2+2+2+1=7 | Denmark: 40 (21-69) vs 44 (21-69) Ireland: 41 (18-66) vs 46 (19-65) |
Denmark: 49.5 vs 31.1 Ireland: 60.8 vs 41.5 |
Denmark: 105 vs 106 Ireland: 51 vs 41 |
|
Tele-education through web-based applications vs usual care | 12 |
|
| Heida et al, 2017 [46] |
Netherlands | 2+2+0+1=5 | 15 (12-16) vs 15 (13-17) |
64 vs 45 | 84 vs 86 |
|
Telemonitoring through web-based applications, email, and phone calls vs usual care |
13 |
|
| Hunt et al, 2017 [44] |
United States | 0+0+0+1=1 | 36 (10) (total participants) |
20.6 (total participants) |
32 vs 31 |
|
Tele-education through cognitive behavioral therapy delivered online vs usual care |
1.5 |
|
| Krier et al, 2011 [45] |
United States | 1+2+1+1=5 | 62.8 (11.5) vs 58.5 (9.6) |
87 vs 68 | 15 vs 19 |
|
Teleconsulting through real-time image vs standard care |
9 |
|
| McCombie et al, 2020 [49] | New Zealand | 2+2+0+1=5 | 35.2 (12.4) vs 34.3 (12.9) |
52 vs 46 | 50 vs 50 |
|
Telemonitoring through smartphone apps vs standard care | 12 |
|
| McCombie et al, 2016 [50] | New Zealand | 2+0+0+1=3 | 38.3 (12.8) vs 39.6 (11.8) |
33.6 vs 38.4 |
113 vs 86 |
|
Tele-education through computerized cognitive behavioral therapy vs usual care | 6 |
|
| Miloh et al, 2017 [43] |
United States | 1+1+1+0=3 | — | — | 21 vs 30 |
|
Telemonitoring through SMS text messaging vs standard care | 12 |
|
| Ozgur Soy et al, 2019 [13] |
Turkey | 2+2+2+1=7 | 37.26(12.99) vs 41.63(11.85) |
56.7 vs 60 |
30 vs 30 |
|
Tele-education through web-based applications on the computer or phone vs standard care |
2 |
|
| Schliep et al, 2020d [41] | United States | 2+2+0+1=5 | 37.3 (11.6) vs 39.3 (13.4) vs 39.5 (12.0) |
45 vs 40.5 vs 37.5 |
71 vs 74 vs 72 |
|
Telemonitoring and tele-education through a mobile phone with SMS text messaging vs standard care | 12 |
|
aThese items were recorded as experimental vs control group.
bIBD: inflammatory bowel disease.
cQoL: quality of life.
dThese studies came from the same clinical trial but reported different outcomes.