Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 8;33(5):1619–1643. doi: 10.1007/s11224-022-01932-0

Table 2.

Compounds managed to pass PLpro-GRL0167 complex pharmacophore hypothesis using Phase virtual screening

Entry Compound name Number of sites matched Matched ligand sites Phase screen score
1 Stachybogrisephenone B 4 A(3) D(7) D(8) R(14) R(-) 1.766
2 4-Dehydroxyaltersolanol A 4 A(5) D(10) D(9) R(13) R(-) 1.723
3 Aspergilline D 4 A(3) D(10) D(11) R(-) R(17) 1.717
4 Altersolanol B 4 A(4) D(9) D(8) R(11) R(-) 1.669
5 Aspergilline E 4 A(3) D(12) D(13) R(-) R(20) 1.513
6 Cytonic acid B 4 A(4) D(12) D(-) R(21) R(20) 1.436
7 Perlolyrine 4 A(1) D(-) D(4) R(6) R(9) 1.435
8 Neosartoryadin A 4 A(3) D(-) D(8) R(12) R(11) 1.434
9 Asperphenalenone D 4 A(7) D(13) D(12) R(23) R(-) 1.419
10 Cordycepin 4 A(4) D(8) D(7) R(-) R(12) 1.400
11 Asperphenalenone A 4 A(6) D(9) D(8) R(22) R(-) 1.330
12 Cytonic acid A 4 A(3) D(9) D(-) R(19) R(20) 1.290
13 Altertoxin I 4 A(1) D(9) D(8) R(-) R(12) 1.244
14 Aspergilline A 4 A(6) D(9) D(7) R(-) R(15) 0.528
15 Aspergilline C 4 A(6) D(9) D(7) R(-) R(17) 0.505

Ligands having Phase screen score above 0.5 are screened