Table 3.
Spotlight a (n = 228) | KEYNOTE-024 b (n = 154) | |
---|---|---|
Complete response (CR) | 17 (7.5) | 7 (4.5) |
Partial response (PR) | 71 (31.1) | 64 (41.6) |
Stable disease | 34 (14.9) | 37 (24.0) |
Progressive disease (PD) | 50 (21.9) | 35 (22.7) |
No evaluable assessment | 56 (24.6) | 0 |
Indeterminate | 1 (0.4) | – |
Pseudoprogression c | 7 (3.1) | – |
Not documented/no assessment | 51 (22.4) | 11 (7.1) |
Data are presented as n (%) of patients.
rwTR determination was based on changes in NSCLC tumor burden indicated by radiology reports. For patients with multiple rwTR assessments, the best response was used to classify the patient (CR>PR>stable disease>PD). Patients without an evaluable assessment (no CR, PR, stable disease, or PD) could be counted >1 time in the subcategories of “no evaluable assessment”.
KEYNOTE-024 results determined using RECIST 1.1 criteria by investigatory review (2).
Pseudoprogression was defined as an increase in tumor size that the clinician recorded as possibly being an effect of ICI therapy.