Table 4.
Comparison of efficacy [n, (%)]
| Group | Marked effective | Effective | Ineffective | Total effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group (n=55) | 39 (70.91) | 13 (23.64) | 3 (5.45) | 52 (94.55) |
| Study group (n=55) | 30 (54.55) | 9 (16.36) | 16 (29.09) | 39 (70.91) |
| χ2 | 10.752 | |||
| P | <0.001 |
Comparison of efficacy [n, (%)]
| Group | Marked effective | Effective | Ineffective | Total effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group (n=55) | 39 (70.91) | 13 (23.64) | 3 (5.45) | 52 (94.55) |
| Study group (n=55) | 30 (54.55) | 9 (16.36) | 16 (29.09) | 39 (70.91) |
| χ2 | 10.752 | |||
| P | <0.001 |