Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Food Prot. 2016 Sep;79(9):1527–1536. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-088

TABLE 4.

Associations between presence of selected provisions and reported outbreak characteristics in 48 statesa

Adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval)b
Comparator Certified food protection manager Prohibition of bare-hand contact 24-h ill staff exclusion
Outbreak characteristic
 Smallc 1.0 (0.8, 1.2) 1.1 (0.8, 1.4) 0.5 (0.4, 0.6)
 Short durationd 1.2 (0.9, 1.6) 1.0 (0.7, 1.3) 0.7 (0.5, 0.9)
Implication of food workers
 Food worker as source of reported outbreak 1.7 (1.3, 2.1) 1.5 (1.1, 2.0) 1.1 (0.9, 1.5)
 Bare-hand contact by a food worker suspected to be infectious 2.5 (1.5, 4.2) 1.4 (0.9, 2.4) 1.7 (1.0, 2.9)
a

Comparison was between states with and those without the specified provision. Three states with no reported outbreaks from 2009 through 2014 were excluded from this analysis.

b

Adjusted for adoption of other two provisions, reporting rate, and whether the state conducted an analytic investigation (case-control or cohort study).

c

Small outbreak defined as <12 estimated primary cases; large outbreak defined as ≥12 estimated primary cases.

d

Short duration defined as <3 days between date of onset of first and last illness; long duration defined as ≥3 days between date of onset of first and last illness.