TABLE 2.

Antibiotic resistance patterns^a

ECOR strain no.	Host	Site	Yr	Group	Antibiotic resistance phenotypeb	Resistance or sensitivityc to:
						Hg	EB
3	Dog	Massachusetts	1983	A	Str Spc Sul Tet	R	S
4	Human	Iowa	1973	A	Sul Tet	S	R
6	Human	Iowa	1973	A	Tet	S	R
10	Human	New York	1983	A	Sul Amp	S	S
16	Leopard	Washington Zood	1973	A	Str Sul Tet	S	S
17	Pig	Indonesia	1973	A	Str Sul Tet	S	S
18	Ape	Washington Zoo	1973	A	Str Sul Tet	S	R
19	Ape	Washington Zoo	1973	A	Str Sul Tet	S	R
24	Human	Sweden	1983	A	Str Sul	S	S
25	Dog	New York	1983	A	Str Sul	S	R
30	Bison	Alberta	1973	B1	Str Tet	S	R
31	Leopard	Washington Zoo	1973	E	Str Spc Sul Amp Kan Tet	R	R
37	Marmoset	Washington Zoo	1973	E	Str Spc Sul Cm Kan	S	S
38	Human	Iowa	1973	D	Tet	S	S
39	Human	Sweden	1983	D	Tet	S	S
48	Human	Sweden	1983	D	Str Spc Sul Tet	R	S
54	Human	Iowa	1973	B2	Sul	S	S
70	Gorilla	Washington Zoo	1973	B1	Sul	S	S

^aAntimicrobial agents tested are listed in Materials and Methods. 

^bStr, streptomycin; Spc, spectinomycin; Sul, sulfonamide; Tet, tetracycline; Amp, ampicillin; Kan, kanamycin; Cm, chloramphenicol. 

^cHg, mercuric chloride; EB, ethidium bromide; R, resistance; S, sensitivity. 

^dSeattle, Wash.