Table 3.
Method | Patients, n | Mean Age at Surgery, y | Follow-Up, y | Results | Study |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Telephone survey | 16 | Unknown | About 5 | Area of sensory loss was greatly improved | Ehretsman et al, 19998 |
Telephone survey | 26 | 32 | 3 | Severity of sensory loss was considerably improved | Miloro and Stoner, 20059 |
Interview | 28 | 25 | 1 | Area of sensory deficit was much improved | Martins et al, 201210 |
Interview | 46 | 18.1 | 4 | Pain and functional deficit were mild | Butler et al, 201711 |
Questionnaire survey | 29 | 30 | 26 | Area and severity of sensory loss and pain were notably improved | IJpma et al, 20066 |
Questionnaire survey | 41 | 23 | 12 | Sensory deficit was decreased in 19 of 41 patients | Hallgren et al, 20137 |
Questionnaire survey | 13 | 38.2 | 29.5 | Severity of sensory disturbance tended to improve | Current study |