Skip to main content
. 2006 Oct 18;2006(4):CD006060. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006060.pub2
Characteristic Goke 2002 Goldberg 2005 Hanefeld 2004 Jovanovic 2004 Langenfeld 2005
  I1: pioglitazone 
 C1: acarbose I1: pioglitazone 
 C1: rosiglitazone I1: pioglitazone + sulfonylureas 
 C1: metformin + sulfonylureas I1: pioglitazone 
 C1: repaglinide 
 C2: repaglinide + pioglitazone I1: pioglitazone 
 C1: glimepiride
Randomised controlled clinical trial (RCT) Y Y Y Y Y
Non‐inferiority / equivalence trial N Y N N N
Controlled clinical trial N N N N N
Design: parallel, crossover, factorial RCT parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel
Design: crossover study N N N N N
Design: factorial study N N N N N
Crossover study: wash‐out phase NA NA NA NA NA
Crossover study: carryover effect tested NA NA NA NA NA
Crossover study: period effect tested NA NA NA NA NA
Method of randomisation computerized, telephone randomisation ‐ stratified for gender, 2 BMI classes and study centers in blocks of 4 stratified for being previously treated with oral antidiabetic drugs and sex ? ? ?
Unit of randomisation (individuals, cluster ‐ specify) individuals individuals individuals individuals individuals
Randomisation stratified for centres Y ? ? ? NA
Randomisation ratio NA NA NA 1:1:2 NA
Concealment of allocation ? ? ? ? ?
Stated blinding (open; single, double, triple blind) open‐label double‐blind double‐blind open‐label open‐label
Actual blinding: participant NA ? ? NA NA
Actual blinding: caregiver / treatment administrator NA ? ? NA NA
Actual blinding: outcome assessor ? ? ? ? Y
Actual blinding: others NA ? ? NA NA
Blinding checked: participant NA ? ? NA NA
Blinding checked: caregiver / treatment administrator NA ? ? NA NA
Primary endpoint defined N Y Y Y N
[n] of primary endpoint(s) 1? 1 1 1 1
[n] of secondary endpoints 9 16 11 6 12
Total [n] of endpoints 10 17 12 7 13
Prior publication of study design N N N N N
Outcomes of prior / current publication identical NA NA NA NA NA
Power calculation N N N Y N
[n] participants per group calculated NA NA NA ? NA
Non‐inferiority trial: interval for equivalence specified NA NA NA NA NA
Intention‐to‐treat analysis (ITT) Y ? Y ? ?
Per‐protocol‐analysis Y (HbA1c) ? ? ? Y
ITT defined N ? Y NA NA
Missing data: last‐observation‐carried‐forward (LOCF) Y Y Y N N
Missing data: other methods N Y N imputed data by means of the incremental mean imputation (IMI) method N
LOCF defined N N Y NA NA
Analysis stratified for centres ? Y ? ? NA
[n] of screened patients 381 4410 ? ? Total: 192
[n] of randomised participants I1: 129 
 C1: 136 
 Total: 265 I1: 369 
 C1: 366 
 Total: 735 I1: 319 
 C1: 320 
 Total: 639 I1: 62 
 C1: 61 
 C2: 123 
 Total: 246 I1: 89 
 C1: 84 
 Total: 173
[n] of participants finishing the study I1: 110 
 C1: 97 
 Total: 207 I1: 299 
 C1: 286 
 Total: 585 I1: 81.5% 
 C1: 87.2% 
 Total: >80% I1: 26 
 C1: 36 
 C: 105 
 Total: 167 I1: 81 
 C1: 81 
 Total: 162
[n] of patients analysed for primary endpoint I1: 129 
 C1: 136 
 Total: 265 I1: 363 
 C1: 356 
 Total: 719 I1: 319 
 C1: 320 
 Total: 639 I1: 57 
 C1: 54 
 C2: 123 
 Total: 234 I1: 89 
 C1: 84 
 Total: 173
Description of discontinuing participants Y Y Y Y Y
Drop‐outs (reasons explained) Y Y Y Y Y
Withdrawals (reasons explained) Y Y Y Y Y
Losses‐to‐follow‐up (reasons explained) Y Y ? ? ?
[n] of participants who discontinued I1: 19 
 C1: 39 
 Total: 58 I1: 70 
 C1: 80 
 Total: 150 I1: 62 
 C1: 41 
 Total: 103 I1: 36 
 C1: 25 
 C2: 18 
 Total: 79 I1: 8 
 C1: 3 
 Total: 11
[%] discontinuation rate I1: 14.7% 
 C1: 28.7% 
 Total: 21.9% I1: 19.0% 
 C1: 21.9% 
 Total: 20.4% I1: 19.5% 
 C1: 12.8% 
 Total: 16.1% I1: 58.1% 
 C1: 41.0% 
 C2: 14.6% I1: 9.9% 
 C1: 3.6% 
 Total: 6.8%
Discontinuation rate similar between groups N Y N N N
[%] crossover between groups C1 to I1: n=24 (24.7%) ? ? ? ?
Differences [n] calculated to analysed patients NA NA NA ? NA
Adjustment for multiple outcomes / repeated measurements N N N N N
Baseline characteristics: clinically relevant differences N N N N N
Treatment identical (apart from intervention) Y Y Y Y Y
Compliance measured Y N N N Y
Other important covariates measured (specify) N N N N N
Co‐morbidities measured N Y N N N
Co‐medications measured N N Y N Y
Specific doubts about study quality Y N N ? N
Funding: commercial Y Y Y ? Y
Funding: non‐commercial N N N ? N
Publication status: peer review journal Y Y Y Y Y
Publication status: journal supplement N N N N N
Publication status: abstract N N N N N
Publication status: other NA NA NA NA NA
Notes one‐sided statistical tests with alpha set at 2.5%; one companion publication no quantitative data on adverse events none randomisation ratio not mentioned (data in table of baseline characteristics only) unclear whether imputation methods were used for missing data; two companion publications
           
Symbols & abbreviations: Y = yes; N = no; ? = unclear I = intervention; C = control