Characteristic |
Goke 2002 |
Goldberg 2005 |
Hanefeld 2004 |
Jovanovic 2004 |
Langenfeld 2005 |
|
I1: pioglitazone
C1: acarbose |
I1: pioglitazone
C1: rosiglitazone |
I1: pioglitazone + sulfonylureas
C1: metformin + sulfonylureas |
I1: pioglitazone
C1: repaglinide
C2: repaglinide + pioglitazone |
I1: pioglitazone
C1: glimepiride |
Randomised controlled clinical trial (RCT) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Non‐inferiority / equivalence trial |
N |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
Controlled clinical trial |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
Design: parallel, crossover, factorial RCT |
parallel |
parallel |
parallel |
parallel |
parallel |
Design: crossover study |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
Design: factorial study |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
Crossover study: wash‐out phase |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Crossover study: carryover effect tested |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Crossover study: period effect tested |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Method of randomisation |
computerized, telephone randomisation ‐ stratified for gender, 2 BMI classes and study centers in blocks of 4 |
stratified for being previously treated with oral antidiabetic drugs and sex |
? |
? |
? |
Unit of randomisation (individuals, cluster ‐ specify) |
individuals |
individuals |
individuals |
individuals |
individuals |
Randomisation stratified for centres |
Y |
? |
? |
? |
NA |
Randomisation ratio |
NA |
NA |
NA |
1:1:2 |
NA |
Concealment of allocation |
? |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Stated blinding (open; single, double, triple blind) |
open‐label |
double‐blind |
double‐blind |
open‐label |
open‐label |
Actual blinding: participant |
NA |
? |
? |
NA |
NA |
Actual blinding: caregiver / treatment administrator |
NA |
? |
? |
NA |
NA |
Actual blinding: outcome assessor |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Y |
Actual blinding: others |
NA |
? |
? |
NA |
NA |
Blinding checked: participant |
NA |
? |
? |
NA |
NA |
Blinding checked: caregiver / treatment administrator |
NA |
? |
? |
NA |
NA |
Primary endpoint defined |
N |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
[n] of primary endpoint(s) |
1? |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
[n] of secondary endpoints |
9 |
16 |
11 |
6 |
12 |
Total [n] of endpoints |
10 |
17 |
12 |
7 |
13 |
Prior publication of study design |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
Outcomes of prior / current publication identical |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Power calculation |
N |
N |
N |
Y |
N |
[n] participants per group calculated |
NA |
NA |
NA |
? |
NA |
Non‐inferiority trial: interval for equivalence specified |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Intention‐to‐treat analysis (ITT) |
Y |
? |
Y |
? |
? |
Per‐protocol‐analysis |
Y (HbA1c) |
? |
? |
? |
Y |
ITT defined |
N |
? |
Y |
NA |
NA |
Missing data: last‐observation‐carried‐forward (LOCF) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
Missing data: other methods |
N |
Y |
N |
imputed data by means of the incremental mean imputation (IMI) method |
N |
LOCF defined |
N |
N |
Y |
NA |
NA |
Analysis stratified for centres |
? |
Y |
? |
? |
NA |
[n] of screened patients |
381 |
4410 |
? |
? |
Total: 192 |
[n] of randomised participants |
I1: 129
C1: 136
Total: 265 |
I1: 369
C1: 366
Total: 735 |
I1: 319
C1: 320
Total: 639 |
I1: 62
C1: 61
C2: 123
Total: 246 |
I1: 89
C1: 84
Total: 173 |
[n] of participants finishing the study |
I1: 110
C1: 97
Total: 207 |
I1: 299
C1: 286
Total: 585 |
I1: 81.5%
C1: 87.2%
Total: >80% |
I1: 26
C1: 36
C: 105
Total: 167 |
I1: 81
C1: 81
Total: 162 |
[n] of patients analysed for primary endpoint |
I1: 129
C1: 136
Total: 265 |
I1: 363
C1: 356
Total: 719 |
I1: 319
C1: 320
Total: 639 |
I1: 57
C1: 54
C2: 123
Total: 234 |
I1: 89
C1: 84
Total: 173 |
Description of discontinuing participants |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Drop‐outs (reasons explained) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Withdrawals (reasons explained) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Losses‐to‐follow‐up (reasons explained) |
Y |
Y |
? |
? |
? |
[n] of participants who discontinued |
I1: 19
C1: 39
Total: 58 |
I1: 70
C1: 80
Total: 150 |
I1: 62
C1: 41
Total: 103 |
I1: 36
C1: 25
C2: 18
Total: 79 |
I1: 8
C1: 3
Total: 11 |
[%] discontinuation rate |
I1: 14.7%
C1: 28.7%
Total: 21.9% |
I1: 19.0%
C1: 21.9%
Total: 20.4% |
I1: 19.5%
C1: 12.8%
Total: 16.1% |
I1: 58.1%
C1: 41.0%
C2: 14.6% |
I1: 9.9%
C1: 3.6%
Total: 6.8% |
Discontinuation rate similar between groups |
N |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
[%] crossover between groups |
C1 to I1: n=24 (24.7%) |
? |
? |
? |
? |
Differences [n] calculated to analysed patients |
NA |
NA |
NA |
? |
NA |
Adjustment for multiple outcomes / repeated measurements |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
Baseline characteristics: clinically relevant differences |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
Treatment identical (apart from intervention) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Compliance measured |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
Y |
Other important covariates measured (specify) |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
Co‐morbidities measured |
N |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
Co‐medications measured |
N |
N |
Y |
N |
Y |
Specific doubts about study quality |
Y |
N |
N |
? |
N |
Funding: commercial |
Y |
Y |
Y |
? |
Y |
Funding: non‐commercial |
N |
N |
N |
? |
N |
Publication status: peer review journal |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Publication status: journal supplement |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
Publication status: abstract |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
Publication status: other |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Notes |
one‐sided statistical tests with alpha set at 2.5%; one companion publication |
no quantitative data on adverse events |
none |
randomisation ratio not mentioned (data in table of baseline characteristics only) |
unclear whether imputation methods were used for missing data; two companion publications |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symbols & abbreviations: Y = yes; N = no; ? = unclear I = intervention; C = control |
|
|
|
|
|