Skip to main content
. 2006 Oct 18;2006(4):CD006060. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006060.pub2

Hanefeld 2004.

Methods DURATION OF INTERVENTION: 
 52 weeks 
 DURATION OF FOLLOW‐UP: 
 52 weeks 
 RUN‐IN PERIOD: 
 none 
 LANGUAGE OF PUBLICATION: 
 English
Participants WHO PARTCIPATED: 
 mainly white patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus 
 INCLUSION CRITERIA: 
 age 35‐75 years, type 2 diabetes inadequately managed on sulphonylureas alone (at >=50% maximal recommended dosage or at maximal tolerated dose for >=3 months) and with stable or worsening glycaemic control for >=3 months; HbA1c 7.5‐11.0%, fasting C‐peptide >=1.5 ng/ml at screening; female patients post‐menopausal, sterilised or using adequate contraception 
 EXCLUSION CRITERIA: 
 type 1 diabetes or ketoacidosis; history of myocardial infarction, transient ischaemic attacks, or stroke in previous 6 months; symptomatic heart failure; malabsorption or pancreatitis; familial polyposis coli; malignant disease in previous 10 years; history of states associated with lactic acidosis or hypoxaemia; substance abuse; pregnant or breast‐feeding women; previous treatment with metformin, pioglitazone or other TZDs not permitted 
 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA: 
 not stated 
 CO‐MORBIDITIES: 
 not stated 
 CO‐MEDICATIONS: 
 thiazides allowed to treat oedema; if antihypertensive treatment indicated, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists or Ca antagonists used
Interventions NUMBER OF STUDY CENTRES: 
 multi, not stated 
 COUNTRY/ LOCATION: 
 various European countries, Canada 
 SETTING: 
 unclear 
 INTERVENTION (DOSE/DAY): 
 pioglitazone; up to 45 mg/day + sulphonylurea at pre‐study dose 
 CONTROL (DOSE/DAY): 
 metformin; 850 mg up to 3x/day (up to 2550 mg/day) + sulphonylurea at pre‐study dose 
 TREATMENT BEFORE STUDY: 
 ‐ sulphonylurea at pre‐study level, no dose increases permitted; SU dose could only be downtitrated in case of symptomatic hypoglyceamia; 
 ‐ most commonly used SUs in both groups: glibenclamide (42%); 
 gliclazide (31%); glimepiride (19%) 
 SU use from baseline to 52 weeks remained similar in both groups and there were very few cases of dose reduction. 
 TITRATION: 
 12 weeks forced titration: 
 ‐ intervention 1: pioglitazone up to 45 mg/day with metformin placebo; starting with pioglitazone 15 mg/day; dose levels increased at weeks 4, 8, and 12 (maximal dose reached by 62%); 
 ‐ control: metformin 850 mg with pioglitazone placebo up to three times a day (2550 mg/day); starting with metformin 850 mg/day; dose levels increased at weeks 4, 8, and 12 (55% reached maximal dose); 
 ‐ cessation or down‐titration only allowed on basis of tolerability issues, including actual hypoglycaemia or increased risk of hypoglycaemia. Maximum tolerated dose established at week 12 maintained throughout remainder of study.
Outcomes PRIMARY OUTCOMES: 
 change in HbA1c from baseline to week 52 
 SECONDARY OUTCOMES: 
 FPG, insulin, C‐peptide, lipids, 32,33 split pro‐insulin, urinary albumine and creatinine, safety parameters, adverse events
Notes AIM OF STUDY: 
 to assess the 1 year efficacy and safety of the addition of pioglitazone or metformin to existing sulphonylurea therapy in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear