Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 7;27(14):2100503. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.14.2100503

Table 5. Factors associated with renal function testing behaviour less frequent than recommended by guidelines, among current PrEP users, Germany, 2018 and 2019 (n = 3,618).

Adequate renal test frequency
n = 2,561
Inadequate renal test frequency
n = 1,057
Univariable analysisa Multivariable analysisb
OR (95% CI) p valuec aOR (95% CI) p valuec
Source of current PrEP
Medical prescription 2,316 90.4 714 67.5 1 1
Informal 235 9.2 340 32.2 4.7 (3.9–5.7) < 0.001 2.9 (2.3–3.7) < 0.001
Missing 10 0.4 3 0.3 Not included
Type of current PrEP use
Daily 2,103 82.1 458 43.3 1 1
On demand/intermittent 452 17.6 597 56.5 6.1 (5.2–7.1) < 0.001 4.9 (4.1–5.9) < 0.001
Missing 6 0.2 2 0.2 Not included
Age (years)
18–29 475 18.5 266 25.2 1.4 (1.2–1.7) < 0.001 1.4 (1.1–1.7) 0.011
30–39 946 36.9 374 35.4 1 1
40–49 767 29.9 260 24.6 0.9 (0.7–1.0) 0.103 0.8 (0.6–1.0) 0.043
50–80 359 14.0 142 13.4 1.0 (0.8–1.3) 0.997 0.9 (0.7–1.2) 0.403
Missing 14 0.5 15 1.4 Not included
Country of origin
Germany 1,774 69.3 627 59.3 1 1
Outside Germany 487 19.0 266 25.2 1.5 (1.3–1.8) < 0.001 1.3 (1.1–1.6) 0.006
Missing 300 11.7 164 15.5 Not included
Annual gross income (EUR)
< 30,000 633 24.7 302 28.6 1.2 (1.0–1.5) 0.025 1.0 (0.8–1.2) 0.790
30,000–49,000 760 29.7 291 27.5 1 1
≥ 50,000 997 38.9 378 35.8 1.0 (0.8–1.2) 0.914 1.0 (0.8–1.2) 0.774
Missing 171 6.7 86 8.1 Not included
Gender
Cisgender male 2,516 98.2 1,025 97.0 1 1
Gender-diverse 29 1.1 17 1.6 1.4 (0.8–2.6) 0.237 0.9 (0.4–2.0) 0.845
Missing 16 0.6 15 1.4 Not included
Test before starting PrEP
Yes 2,545 99.4 914 86.5 1 d
No 14 0.5 127 12.0 25.3 (14.5–44.1) < 0.001
Missing 2 0.1 16 1.5 Not included
Payment for testing
Cost coveragee 1,430 55.8 351 33.2 1 d
Self-payment 1,028 40.1 272 25.7 1.1 (0.9–1.3) 0.407
Missing 103 4.0 434 41.1 Not included
Location of testing,
Physician 2,002 78.2 413 39.1 1 d
Physician and  other locations 282 11.0 86 8.1 1.5 (1.1–1.9) 0.004
Only using checkpoints, self-tests, or other locations 267 10.4 161 15.2 2.9 (2.3–3.7) < 0.001
Missing 10 0.4 397 37.6 Not included
Number of anal/vaginal sex partners within the last 6 months
0–3 302 11.8 204 19.3 2.2 (1.8–2.7) < 0.001 d
4–10 796 31.1 399 37.7 1.6 (1.4–1.9) < 0.001
> 10 1,412 55.1 430 40.7 1
Missing 51 2.0 24 2.3 Not included
Condom use while taking PrEP
Always/often 485 18.9 265 25.1 1.4 (1.2–1.7) < 0.001 d
About half of the
times/sometimes/never
2,049 80.0 779 73.7 1
Missing 27 1.1 13 1.2 Not included

CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; PrEP: pre-exposure prophylaxis; STI: sexually transmitted infection.

a Univariable logistic regression model.

b Multivariable logistic regression model to investigate the association of informal PrEP use and infrequent testing behaviour including 2,155 participants with adequate and 858 participants with inadequate renal testing frequency, adjusting for age, gender, country of origin, annual gross income and type of PrEP use.

c Wald test.

d Not included in the multivariable regression model (see Supplement, section S1 for selection of confounders).

e For some PrEP users, the costs for tests can be covered by health insurance in case of symptomatic infection or HIV/STI diagnoses among sexual partners or through clinical trials.