Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD002991. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002991.pub3

Hattotuwa 2002.

Methods Design: parallel‐group
 Randomisation: yes, random number table
 Blinding: double‐blind
 Withdrawals: stated
Participants Setting: hospital outpatient clinic
 Number eligible: not stated
 Number enrolled: 37
 Number in treatment group: 17
 Number in control group: 19
 Number of withdrawals (treatment/control): 1/5 + 1 insufficient biopsy
 Number completing trial (treatment/control): 16/14
 Age range: 40 to 75 years
 Sex: 26 M, 4 F
 Ethnicity: not stated
 COPD diagnosis: FEV1 25% to 80% of predicted
 Severity of COPD: mean FEV1 % predicted FP 46.2%, placebo 45.5%
 Inclusion criteria: current or ex‐smokers > 20 pack‐years
 Exclusion criteria: atopy, acute bronchodilator reversibility, severe concurrent medical problems, chest infection within 8 weeks before study
 Baseline characteristics of treatment/control groups: comparable
Interventions FP 500 µg, 2 times a day (1,000 µg/d)
 Placebo
 Multidose dry powder inhaler (Accuhaler)
 3 months
Outcomes Peak flow
 Symptom score
 Spirometry
 Exhaled carbon monoxide
 Bronchoscopy
 Exacerbations
Notes Run‐in 8 weeks
Had steroid trial (prednisolone 30 mg, 2 weeks) after cessation of FP for 1 month
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "random number table"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Information not available
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "double blind"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Withdrawals: 1 FP, 5 placebo
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported