Loppow 2001.
Methods | Design: cross‐over, 4 weeks washout Randomisation: yes, method not stated Blinding: double‐blind Withdrawals: stated | |
Participants | Setting: single‐centre study, Germany, hospital outpatient clinic Number eligible: not stated Number enrolled: 19 Number in treatment group: 19 (cross‐over) Number in control group: 19 (cross‐over) Number of withdrawals (treatment/control): 0/0 Number completing trial (treatment/control): 19/19 Age range: 31 to 77 years Sex: 12 M, 7 F Ethnicity: not stated COPD diagnosis: chronic bronchitis (ATS criteria, cough and sputum production), current or ex‐smokers > 20 pack‐years Severity of COPD: mean FEV1 83.4% predicted (2 patients had no airflow obstruction) Inclusion criteria: as for COPD diagnosis; 14 patients had bronchial hyper‐responsiveness (PC20 methacholine < 8 mg/mL) Exclusion criteria: use of inhaled or systemic corticosteroids in previous 3 months, respiratory tract infection in previous 4 weeks Baseline characteristics of treatment/control groups: cross‐over study | |
Interventions | FP 1000 µg/day Placebo Delivery device not stated 4 weeks each treatment period (cross‐over) |
|
Outcomes | FEV1 VC Exhaled NO Induced sputum cell count Induced sputum fluid‐phase markers (LCH, ECP, elastase, IL‐8, iNOS) | |
Notes | Chronic bronchitis patients included, not only COPD with airflow obstruction 14/19 patients had bronchial hyper‐responsiveness (PC20 MCh < 8 mg/mL) and 6/19 had positive skin prick test |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "randomised" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Information not available |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "double blind" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No withdrawals |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes reported |