Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD002991. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002991.pub3

Ozol 2005.

Methods Design: parallel‐group
Randomisation: yes, computer‐generated
Blinding: double‐blind
 Withdrawals: stated
Participants Setting: single‐centre study, Turkey
 Number eligible: not stated
 Number enrolled: 26
 Number in treatment group: 13
 Number in control group: 13
 Number of withdrawals (treatment/control): 1/3
 Number completing trial (treatment/control): 12/10
 Age range: mean 65 years
 Sex: 18 M, 4 F
 Ethnicity: not stated
 COPD diagnosis: stable mild to moderate COPD (GOLD criteria) (mild = > 80% predicted FEV1; moderate = 50% to 80% predicted FEV1)
 Severity of COPD: FEV1 61.1% predicted (BUD); FEV1 57.3% predicted (placebo)
 Inclusion criteria: FEV1/FVC < 70%, FEV1 > 50% predicted; reversibility of < 200 mL with inhaled salbutamol or less than 12% predicted FEV1; stable COPD; no other systemic or pulmonary disease; no therapy with inhaled or systemic corticosteroids within 3 months; no history asthma or atopy
 Exclusion criteria: not stated
 Baseline characteristics of treatment/control groups: comparable
Interventions BUD 400 µg, 2 times a day (800 µg/day)
 Placebo
Outcomes Spirometry
 BAL cell counts and via bronchoscopy
 IL8 count
 Weekly diary ‐ change in cough, dyspnoea, sputum production noted
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "randomised by computer‐generated, blinded randomisation list"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "treatment randomly assigned"
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "double‐blinded"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Withdrawals: 1 BUD, 2 placebo
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported