Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD002991. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002991.pub3

SCO30002 2005.

Methods Design: parallel‐group
 Randomisation: yes, method not stated
 Blinding: double‐blind
 Withdrawals: stated
Participants Setting: multicentre study, hospital outpatient clinic
 Number eligible: 300
 Number enrolled: 256
 Number in treatment group: 131 FP arm
 Number in control group: 125
 Number of withdrawals (treatment/control): 34/40
 Number completing trial (treatment/control): 97/85
 Age range: mean age 64.6 years FP arm, 65.7 placebo arm
 Sex: 209 M, 47 F
 Ethnicity: 100% Caucasian
 COPD diagnosis: pre‐bronchodilator baseline FEV1/VC < 88% for men and < 89% for women of predicted normal and FEV1 < 70% of predicted normal, but > 800 mL
 
 Inclusion criteria: aged > 40 years, established clinical history of COPD, poor reversibility of airflow obstruction (< 10% increase of FEV1) after bronchodilator, current or ex‐smokers with smoking history of at least 10 pack‐years
 Exclusion criteria: not stated
 Baseline characteristics of treatment/control groups: comparable
Interventions FP 500 µg, 2 times a day (1000 µg/day)
 Placebo
Outcomes No of COPD exacerbations
 Number of withdrawals due to COPD exacerbations
 FEV1 pre‐bronchodilator
 FEV1/VC
 FVC
 Record card symptoms ‐ cough, breathlessness
 Use of relief bronchodilator
 PEFR
 Shuttle walking test
 Borg scale
 St George Respiratory Questionnaire
 Adverse events
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "randomised"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Information not available
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "double‐blind"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Withdrawals: 26% FP, 32% placebo
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported