Table 3.
Moved in the last year | Moved in the last year between PUMAs | |
---|---|---|
Household income-to-needs ratio, % (SE) | ||
< .5 | 34.9 (0.1) | 13.4 (0.1) |
.5–1.0 | 26.2 (0.1) | 8.3 (0.1) |
1.0–1.5 | 24.8 (0.1) | 8.0 (0.1) |
1.5+ | 25.0 (0.1) | 8.8 (0.1) |
Note. SE = Standard Error; PUMAs = Public Use Microdata Areas. I limited my analytic sample to renters aged 18 or older who are income-eligible for the HCV program participation. To determine respondents’ income eligibility status, I compared their household income to the 50% of AMI in the HUD-defined area to which they belong. When the lowest level of geography (PUMA) for place of residence does not uniquely identify a HUD defined area, I used the max 50% of AMI among possible HUD defined areas within the PUMA. Author’s own calculation using IPUMS USA dataset (10.0 version) (Ruggles et al., 2020).