Table 2:
Simulation runtime comparison: average runtime (in seconds) of the selected methods for each set of the tuning parameters with the best results in bold.
| Examples | Concave | Concave-2 | LSC-quad | LSC-check | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| # | n | p | q | K | ||||
| 1 | 300 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 18.5 | 15.8 | 11.0 | 12.1 |
| 2 | 300 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 692 | 91.7 | 71.1 | 107.3 |
| 3 | 300 | 24 | 5 | 2 | 16954 | 1054.1 | 2364.1 | 2433.7 |
| 4 | 300 | 4 | 50 | 3 | 793.8 | 771.7 | 161.5 | 186.5 |
| 5 | 300 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 2225.1 | 1793.5 | 458.5 | 537.1 |
| 6 | 300 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 2244.5 | 6320.7 | 436.7 | 507.4 |
| 7 | 600 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 9513 | 7078.6 | 2666.6 | 3373.1 |
| 8 | 600 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 40514.5 | 35540.8 | 11116.2 | 14739.0 |