Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: Psychother Psychosom. 2020 Aug 19;90(1):28–40. doi: 10.1159/000509283

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Comparison of major depression classification odds of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) versus the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID)

The figure presents the aOR of major depression classification for the CIDI compared to the SCID for primary studies based on the PHQ-9, EPDS, and HADS-D and pooled estimates at standardized scores of −1, 0, 1, 2 and 3. The standardized scores of −1, 0, 1, 2 and 3 are approximately equal to scores of 0, 5, 10, 16 and 21 on the PHQ-9 (SD = 5.26); 1, 7, 13, 18 and 24 on the EPDS (SD = 5.58); and 1, 5, 9, 13 and 17 on the HADS-D (SD = 4.07). We present standardized scores from −1 to 3, because raw scores corresponding to standardized scores below −1 or above 3 would be negative or beyond the maximum scores of the included screening tools.

Abbreviations: EPDS: Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; HADS-D: Depression subscale of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; META: Pooled estimates from the synthesis meta-analysis. PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire-9.