Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 26;41(15):2210–2224. doi: 10.1038/s41388-022-02241-w

Fig. 2. Anti-EGFR-mAB-protamine (αEGFR-mAB-P) conjugates do not bind and transport siRNA efficiently after depletion of free SMCC-protamine by HPLC.

Fig. 2

A Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE showing αEGFR-mAB-P, αEGFR-mAB-P coupled with 32x SMCC-protamine and HPLC-fractions 25–31 of anti-EGFR-mAB coupled with 32x SMCC-protamine after depletion of unbound SMCC-protamine; HC heavy chain, LC light chain, -P SMCC-protamine. B Band-shift assays showing that non-SMCC-protamine-depleted αEGFR-mAB-P binds siRNA in a 1:8 to 1:16 molar ratio (left part), whereas the chromatographically depleted αEGFR-mAB-P does not bind siRNA. CE Dynamics of internalisation of Alexa488-siRNA by confocal internalisation studies with depleted vs. non-depleted αEGFR-mAB-P with fluorescence-tagged siRNA on A549 NSCLC cells. Blue fluorescence for nuclei, red for actin, green for internalised Alexa488-siRNA. C Non-depleted αEGFR-mAB-P transports Alexa488-siRNA to A549 intracellular vesicles. Please note the cytoplasmic and perinuclear localisation of Alexa488-positive vesicles (compare also to Supplementary Fig. 5). The purification process leads to abolished internalisation of siRNA (D). SMCC-protamine alone does not work as an unspecific transfection agent (E). Scale bars 10 µm. F Dynamics of Alexa488-siRNA internalisation to A549 cells mediated by non-depleted αEGFR-mAB-P/P vs. SMCC-protamine-depleted αEGFR-mAB-P, controlled by SMCC-protamine only as carrier molecule in flow cytometric analysis (n = 3; error bars indicate SEM). Statistical significance was tested by two-way ANOVA with subsequent Tukey’s multiple comparison test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). Of note, only the non-SMCC-protamine-depleted conjugate presented a significant siRNA internalisation compared to SMCC-protamine-depleted and SMCC-protamine from 6 h into A549 cells. G, H Functional relevance of free SMCC-protamine in the reaction mixture. Non-depleted αEGFR-mAB-P-transported KRAS siRNA leads to significant reduction of colony formation in NSCLC A549 cells (G) and NSCLC SK-LU1 cells (H) in comparison to control (scrambled, scr) siRNA, whereas the depletion of free SMCC-protamine completely abolishes this effect. SMCC-protamine alone (without αEGFR-mAB) again is not able to efficiently transport and internalise KRAS siRNA seen by no effect in colony assay (H, right bars; Mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Two-sided t-test, *p < 0.05).