Table 4.

The association between CD36 rs1761667 polymorphism and blood pressure and fasting blood glucose. All analyses were conducted using a random-effects model^a.

	No. of data-sets	No. of subjects	Meta-analysis		Heterogeneity
			WMD2 (95%CI)	Peffect	Q statistic	Pwithin	I2 (%)
Systolic Blood pressure (mmHg) b
Allelic model (A vs. G)	5	4224	− 2.01 (− 4.92, 0.90)	0.17	36.92	< 0.001	89.20
Dominant model (AA + GA vs. GG)		2112	− 4.17 (− 9.22, 0.88)	0.10	38.98	< 0.001	89.70
Recessive model (AA vs. GA + GG)		2112	− 4.83 (− 12.95, 3.28)	0.24	126.85	< 0.001	96.80
Homozygous model (AA vs. GG)		1050	− 8.42 (− 18.09, 1.24)	0.08	85.03	< 0.001	95.30
Heterozygous model (GA vs. GG)		1669	− 3.30 (− 7.84, 1.23)	0.15	28.79	< 0.001	86.10
Diastolic Blood pressure (mmHg) b
Allelic model (A vs. G)	6	4448	− 0.14 (− 0.75, 0.46)	0.63	4.89	0.43	0.00
Dominant model (AA + GA vs. GG)		2224	− 0.14 (− 1.20, 0.92)	0.79	0.87	0.97	0.00
Recessive model (AA vs. GA + GG)		2224	− 0.85 (− 2.56, 0.85)	0.32	9.50	0.08	47.70
Homozygous model (AA vs. GG)		1113	− 0.57 (− 2.14, 1.00)	0.47	5.87	0.31	14.80
Heterozygous model (GA vs. GG)		1759	0.001 (− 1.11, 1.11)	0.99	0.33	0.99	0.00
Fasting blood glucose (mg/dl) b
Allelic model (A vs. G)	7	4610	2.07 (− 0.11, 4.25)	0.06	23.76	0.001	74.70
Dominant model (AA + GA vs. GG)		2305	3.64 (− 0.89, 8.17)	0.11	49.96	< 0.001	0.88
Recessive model (AA vs. GA + GG)		2305	2.33 (0.92, 3.74)	0.001	6.03	0.42	0.40
Homozygous model (AA vs. GG)		1173	4.28 (− 1.02, 9.60)	0.11	30.42	< 0.001	80.30
Heterozygous model (GA vs. GG)		1813	3.07 (− 1.17, 7.33)	0.15	39.95	< 0.001	85.00

Significant values are in bold.

^aAll analyses were done using the random-effects model.

^bThere was no evidence of publication bias by observing the funnel plots.

WMD, weighted mean difference; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.