1. Visibility of system status |
3 |
|
|
2. Real-world match |
2 |
Survey section numbering, sequence, and naming were logical and consistent with real world conventions
Survey questions follow conventions for type and format
Embedded YouTube videos take advantage of familiar features, platform
|
Procedure for leaving and returning was not conventional or natural
“Survey” terms in standardized research questionnaires did not match real-world conventions
Additional section links are hard to find, and function in unconventional and nonnatural ways
|
3. User control |
2 |
|
|
4. Consistency |
2 |
|
|
5. Error prevention |
3 |
|
|
6. Recognition |
3 |
Instructions for system use are readily available throughout
Questionnaires and check-ins provide built-in references to past information
Educational videos, FAQa, and additional resources are available at the bottom of each page
|
|
7. Flexibility |
3 |
Font resize option is available
Survey queue automatically accordions up as surveys are completed, but still provides an option to view all
|
|
8. Aesthetic |
3 |
|
|
9. Error messaging |
3 |
|
|
10. Help and documentation |
2 |
FAQ and help email are readily available on survey queue/home page
FAQ is available on all main survey pages
Instructions for use are available throughout the module
|
Help is not searchable
No documentation for technical issues
No centralized overview of instructions, features, problems, and complex tasks
|