Table 5.
Experimental results of different methods on COVID-19 dataset-C
| Methods | Acc (%) | F1 (%) | AUC (%) |
| Mittal et al. [32] | 64.41 | 62.25 | - |
| DenseNet-169 [20] | 79.5 | 76.0 | 90.1 |
| DenseNet-169+ [20] | 85.0 | 85.9 | 92.8 |
| ResNet-50 (Self-Trans) [34] | 84 | 83 | 91 |
| DenseNet-169 (Self-Trans) [34] | 86. | 85.0 | 94 |
| Wang et al. [35] | 78.69 | 78.83 | 85.32 |
| Ours (ResNet50) | 84.32 | 83.9 | 91.6 |
| Ours (DenseNet-169) | 87.15 | 87.60 | 95.29 |
+ represents using lung mask as auxiliary input. (Best in bold)