Table 6.
Experimental results of different methods on COVID-19 dataset-D
| Methods | Acc (%) | F1 (%) | AUC (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wang et al. [35] | 90.83 | 90.87 | 96.24 |
| ResNet+CBAM [40] | 91.55 | 92.31 | 97.52 |
| ResNet+SE [39] | 91.95 | 91.42 | 96.99 |
| Harsh et al. [48] | 95 | 95 | - |
| Ma et al. [29] | 95.16 | 95.60 | 99.01 |
| Ours (DenseNet-169) | 96.98 | 97.01 | 99.38 |
(Best in bold)