Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 2;142(5):871–878. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03977-y

Table 2.

Results of implant positioning

Variable Group A (n = 70) Group B (n = 47)
Cup inclination (°) 40.63 ± 5.95 43.84 ± 6.25
Within target zone 65 (92.9%) 39 (83%)
Outside target zone 5 (7.1%) 8 (17%)
p value 0.097
Cup anteversion (°) 28.62 ± 4.59 30.82 ± 6.08
Within target zone 40 (57.1%) 25 (53.2%)
Outside target zone 30 (42.9%) 22 (46.8%)
p value 0.675
Stem alignment (°) (varus/valgus) 5.33 ± 3.54 5.46 ± 3.44
p value 0.833
CI (%) 59.72 ± 5.62 59.70 ± 4.56
p value 0.761
CFI (%) 79.8 ± 7.26 80.25 ± 8.29
p value 0.717
CFII (%) 82.7 ± 7.6 83.07 ± 7.9
p value 0.703
CFIII (%) 85.85 ± 10.17 83.81 ± 10.72
p value 0.427