Table 1.
Evaluation step | Points (0–10) |
---|---|
1. Visibility of the bleeding artery on the CT scan | 1 Point (10%) |
2. Segmentation | 1 Point (10%) |
3D printing | |
3. Main artery printed | 1 Point (10%) |
4. Procedure-relevant artery printed | 1 Point (10%) |
Simulation setup | |
5. Connection established | 1 Point (10%) |
Catheterization | |
6. Guidewire advanced to the main artery | 1 Point (10%) |
7. Stable main catheter position in the main artery | 1 Point (10%) |
8. Microwire advanced to the bleeding artery | 1 Point (10%) |
9. Stable microcatheter position in the bleeding artery | 1 Point (10%) |
Embolization | |
10. Application of the procedure-related embolic agents | 1 Point (10%) |
Total | 0–10 Points (0-100%) |
The technical evaluation model uses a 10-point grading scale to rate the success of each procedural simulation. It involves the main steps of 3D printing, simulation setup, catheterization and embolization