Table 1.
Parameter | How to determine LA myopathy | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|
LA maximum volume [13] | -Increased LA volumes at the end of atrial diastole as assessed by biplane method of discs | -Cost-effective -Technology readily available -Associated with poor outcomes in AF-HF |
-Potential for foreshortening leading to improper calculation of LA volume -Increased LA volume may not occur until the late stages of LA myopathy |
LA minimum volume [14] | -Increased LA volumes at the end of atrial systole as assessed by biplane method of discs | -Cost-effective -Technology readily available -Associated with poor outcomes in AF-HF -Greater association with LA myopathy than LA maximum volume |
-Potential for foreshortening leading to improper calculation of LA volume -Increased LA volume may not occur until the late stages of LA myopathy |
LA emptying fraction [15, 16] | -Decreased LA emptying fraction, as calculated by the equation: ((LA maximum volume − LA minimum volume)/(LA maximum volume)) | -Cost-effective -Technology readily available -Associated with poor outcomes in AF-HF |
-Potential for foreshortening leading to improper calculation of LA volumes -Decreased LA emptying fraction may not occur until the late stages of LA myopathy |
LA Functional Index [17] | -Decreased LA functional index as calculated by the equation: ((LA emptying fraction × outflow tract velocity time integral)/(LA max volume indexed to BMI)) |
-Cost-effective -Technology readily available -Can be calculated independent of rhythm -Provides a functional estimate of LA mechanics |
-Potential for foreshortening leading to improper calculation of LA volumes -Calculations may be impacted by patient age, heart rate, and LA size |
Mitral inflow Doppler pattern [18] | -Decreased A-wave velocity | -Cost effective -Technology readily available |
-Cannot be measured in setting of AF -Low velocities may only be present in later stages of disease |
LA tissue Doppler [19] |
-Decreased a′ tissue velocity (< 5 cm/s) | -Cost effective -Technology readily available |
-Potential for inaccuracy due to foreshortened views of the LA -Cannot be measured in the setting of AF -Low velocities may only be present in later stages of disease |
LA strain [20] | -Decreased reservoir, conduit or booster strain | -Cost-effective -Technology readily available -Potential to post-process images if strain is not obtained on acquired images -Sensitive measurement of atrial dynamics that can detect changes to LA myocardium early in the disease course -Holds significant prognostic value in AF-HF |
-Potential for inaccuracy due to foreshortened views of the LA -Manufacturer-dependent algorithms may lead to discrepant measurements -Potential for user-related error when tracing the endocardial border |
Cardiac MRI [21] | -Presence of macroscopic LA scar (late gadolinium enhancement) | -Sensitive and noninvasive method of evaluating LA fibrosis -Ability to provide additional information about myocardial structure |
-High cost -Limited availability -Long duration of exam -Dependent on patient participation -Requires specific imaging protocol that may be center-dependent |
Four-dimensional flow MRI [22] | -Decreased velocity of flow as determined by post-processing calculations | -Ability to quantify flow through the LA -Sensitive to subtle decreases in flow velocity which infer LA myopathy |
-High cost -Limited availability of 4D flow MRI technology -Long duration of exam -Dependent on heart rate and patient participation -Does not provide information about LA myocardial tissue |
Electroanatomic mapping [23] | -Areas of decreased voltage in the LA prior to ablation | -High sensitivity in determining areas of impaired LA conduction | -Very high cost -Invasive procedure -Does not provide information about LA mechanical function |
Abbreviations: LA left atrium, AF-HF comorbid atrial fibrillation and heart failure, BMI body mass index, AF atrial fibrillation, MRI magnetic resonance imaging