Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2021 Oct 11;31(6):531–548. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2022.1986002

Table 2.

Randomized Clinical Trials of Neoadjuvant / Adjuvant Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer.

Study Patient Population Sample Size Treatment pCR Rate Comment
NCT03036488
KEYNOTE-522
Phase 3
Double-blind
Placebo-controlled
T1cN1–2 or
T2–4N0–2
n = 784



n = 390
Paclitaxel + Carboplatin + Pembrolizumab → AC/EC + Pembrolizumab → Surgery → Pembrolizumab

Paclitaxel + Carboplatin + Placebo →
AC/EC + Placebo → Surgery → Placebo
63.0%



55.6%

(not formally tested)
Results listed for IA3. Significant pCR difference at IA1 (p = 0.00055) and IA2 (p = 0.00221), not tested at IA3.
At IA4, 3-year EFS 84.5% vs 76.8% (p = 0.00031)
NCT03197935
IMpassion031
Phase 3
Double-blind
Placebo-controlled
Unilateral tumor >2cm n = 165


n = 168
nab-paclitaxel + Atezolizumab
→ EC + Atezolizumab

nab-paclitaxel + Placebo
→ EC + Placebo
58%


41%

(p = 0.0044)
PD-L1+ pCR rates:
69% vs 49% (p = 0.021)
NCT03726879
IMpassion050
Phase 3
Double-blind
Placebo-controlled
T2–4N1–3 disease
HER2+
n = 226


n = 228
AC + Atezolizumbab → Paclitaxel + HP + Atezolizumab → Surgery → HP + Atezolizumab

AC + Placebo → Paclitaxel + HP + Placebo → Surgery → HP + Placebo
62.4%


62.7%

(p = 1.0)
PD-L1+ pCR rates:
64.2% vs 72.5% (p = 0.2)
NCT02620280
NeoTRIPaPDL1
Phase 3
Open label
T1cN1+ or T3N0+
Unilateral IDC
High Ki-67 or Grade
n = 142


n = 138
nab-paclitaxel + Carboplatin + Atezolizumab
→ Surgery → AC/EC/FEC

nab-paclitaxel + Carboplatin
→ Surgery → AC/EC/FEC
43.5%


40.8%

(p = 0.66)
Difference in pCR not significant
NCT01042379
I-SPY2
Phase 2
Adaptively randomized
Open label
HER2-
Tumor > 2cm on imaging / 2.5cm on exam
MammaPrint low-risk excluded
n = 69

n = 181
Paclitaxel + Pembrolizumab → AC

Paclitaxel → AC
44%

17%

(not formally tested)
TNBC pCR rates:
60% vs 22%
HR+ pCR rates:
30% vs 13%
n = 73

n = 295
Paclitaxel + Pembrolizumab → Pembrolizumab

Paclitaxel → AC
15%

15%

(not formally tested)
Protocol amended so patients no longer received pembro monotherapy due to 3 progressions
n = 73

n = 299
Paclitaxel + Olaparib + Durvalumab → AC

Paclitaxel → AC
37%

20%

(not formally tested)
TNBC pCR rates:
47% vs 27%
HR+ pCR rates:
28% vs 14%
n = 73

n = 299
Paclitaxel + SD-101 + Pembrolizumab → AC

Paclitaxel → AC
34%

20%

(not formally tested)
TNBC pCR rates:
44% vs 28%
HR+ pCR rates:
26% vs 14%
NCT02685059
GeparNuevo
Phase 2
Double-blind
Placebo-controlled
Tumor ≥ 2cm n = 88


n = 86
nab-paclitaxel + Durvalumab → EC + Durvalumab

nab-paclitaxel + Placebo → EC + Placebo
53.4%

44.2%

(p = 0.224)
Improvement seen in DDFS (HR 0.37, p = 0.0148) and OS (HR 0.26, p = 0.0076) with addition of durvalumab

Outcomes listed for immunotherapy containing arm vs non-immunotherapy arm.

pCR = pathologic complete response. HER2 = human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. HR = hormone receptor. TNBC = triple negative breast cancer. A = adriamycin. C = cyclophosphamide. E = epirubicin. F = 5-fluorouracil. PD-L1 = programmed death ligand-1. IDC = invasive ductal carcinoma. IA = interim analysis. HP = trastuzumab + pertuzumab