Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 11.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2019 Oct 25;145:104497. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104497

Table 4.

Snacking Meal Characteristic Differences Stratified by Child Overweight and Non-Overweight Status (N=1,080 Snacking Occasions; N=73 Overweight and N=77 Nonoverweight)

Food Preparation Overweight (N=73) Nonoverweight (N=77)
N Occasions
(Overall %)a
N Participant
(Between %)b
Average Participant
Frequency (Within
%)c
N Occasions
(Overall %)a
N Participant
(Between %)b
Average Participant
Frequency (Within
%)c
P Valued
Who prepared the meal?
Parent/partner 258 (53%) 58 (79%) 65% 325 (55%) 66 (86%) 61% 0.70
A cook outside home (e.g. fast food, restaurant, another adult) 128 (26%) 44 (60%) 41% 141 (24%) 50 (65%) 33% 0.47
Child participant + parent/partner 102 (21%) 37 (51%) 41% 126 (21%) 41 (53%) 39% 0.85
How was the meal prepared?
Only homemade 165 (34%) 59 (81%) 44% 246 (42%) 60 (78%) 50% 0.19
Only pre-prepared 260 (53%) 60 (82%) 56% 255 (43%) 58 (75%) 52% 0.03
Only fast-food 41 (8%) 23 (32%) 26% 53 (9%) 29 (38%) 29% 0.40
Combination of homemade, pre-pared, fast-food 22 (5%) 19 (26%) 27% 38 (6%) 23 (30%) 21% 0.11
What were the primary decisions about what was served?
Child / family likes 95 (19%) 43 (59%) 37% 150 (25%) 46 (60%) 40% 0.04
Child asked for a specific food or meal 92 (19%) 36 (49%) 38% 136 (23%) 44 (57%) 36% 0.34
Desire to avoid conflict with child or a family fight 5 (1%) 4 (5%) 15% 28 (5%) 11 (14%) 33% 0.04
Healthy option 70 (14%) 34 (47%) 33% 73 (12%) 33 (43%) 24% 0.27
Planned meal 28 (6%) 20 (27%) 19% 20 (3%) 15 (19%) 15% 0.13
Using food available in the home 58 (12%) 28 (38%) 30% 77 (13%) 35 (45%) 26% 0.93
Quick and easy to make 71 (15%) 32 (44%) 30% 63 (11%) 36 (47%) 24% 0.12
Other 69 (14%) 30 (41%) 28% 45 (8%) 28 (36%) 26% 0.02
Social Dimensions of the Eating Occasion Overweight (N=73) Nonoverweight (N=77)
N Occasions
(Overall %)a
N Participant
(Between %)b
Average Participant
Frequency (Within
%)c
N Occasions
(Overall %)a
N Participant
(Between %)b
Average Participant
Frequency (Within
%)c
P Valued
How many children were present?
Child participant 86 (18%) 37 (51%) 40% 95 (16%) 34 (44%) 34% 0.37
Two children 158 (32%) 47 (64%) 48% 235 (40%) 55 (71%) 53% 0.46
Three children or more 244 (50%) 55 (75%) 61% 262 (44%) 50 (65%) 65% 0.85
Who were these children?
Child participant 86 (18%) 37 (51%) 40% 95 (16%) 34 (44%) 34% 0.37
Child participant + siblings(s) 318 (65%) 59 (81%) 73% 418 (71%) 68 (88%) 77% 0.21
Child participant + siblings(s)+others 84 (17%) 34 (47%) 39% 79 (13%) 33 (43%) 28% 0.39
Note for others: extended family members or non-family members
How many adults were present?
Parent participant 288 (59%) 64 (88%) 65% 329 (56%) 66 (86%) 63% 0.18
Parent participant + another adult(s) 200 (41%) 55 (75%) 53% 263 (44%) 56 (73%) 56% 0.18
Who were these adults?
Parent/primary caregiver 288 (59%) 64 (88%) 65% 328 (55%) 66 (86%) 63% 0.18
Parent + other family member(s) 181 (37%) 51 (70%) 52% 240 (41%) 52 (68%) 54% 0.21
Parent + other family member + non-family member 19 (4%) 13 (18%) 23% 23 (4%) 16 (21%) 21% 0.82
Note for other family member: second caregiver and grandparent
Features of the Eating Occasion Overweight (N=73) Nonoverweight (N=77)
N Occasions
(Overall %)a
N Participant
(Between %)b
Average Participant
Frequency (Within
%)c
N Occasions
(Overall %)a
N Participant
(Between %)b
Average Participant
Frequency (Within
%)c
P Valued
Where did the meal take place?
Around the table 209 (43%) 67 (92%) 50% 279 (47%) 60 (78%) 60% 0.30
On couch/chair in living area 156 (32%) 49 (67%) 45% 128 (22%) 42 (55%) 37% 0.02
Scattered throughout house or standing-up 65 (13%) 22 (30%) 30% 100 (17%) 38 (49%) 33% 0.18
Outside house (e.g. in the car, at a restaurant, other) 58 (12%) 25 (34%) 34% 85 (14%) 34 (44%) 26% 0.95
Note for other: at a park, school's picnic table/event, neighbor's home, relative's home, or friend's home.
What kinds of foods were eaten?
All Grains 140 (29%) 47 (64%) 42% 203 (34%) 60 (78%) 40% 0.81
Dairy 147 (30%) 50 (68%) 44% 184 (31%) 58 (75%) 42% 0.92
Fruit and Vegetables 201 (41%) 58 (79%) 51% 327 (55%) 62 (81%) 59% 0.03
Meat, Beans, and Nuts 82 (17%) 34 (47%) 36% 118 (20%) 47 (61%) 32% 0.99
Added Sugar (e.g., sugary drinks, cake, candy) 127 (26%) 48 (66%) 37% 132 (22%) 48 (62%) 31% 0.92
What was happening during the meal or snack?
Conversation only 173 (35%) 53 (73%) 49% 264 (45%) 63 (82%) 55% 0.08
Screentime activities only 149 (31%) 48 (66%) 44% 106 (18%) 44 (57%) 33% 0.002
Screentime + conversation 87 (18%) 36 (49%) 37% 125 (21%) 37 (48%) 36% 0.54
Conversation + other 4 (1%) 3 (4%) 20% 21 (4%) 9 (12%) 23% 0.09
No conversation + other 75 (15%) 29 (40%) 34% 76 (13%) 30 (39%) 28% 0.62
Note for screentime activities: Listening to headphones; playing videogames; watching TV and/or TV in background; using cell phone, computer, or tablet
Note for other: Reading/looking at a book or none of the above
What was the atmosphere like?
Relaxed 150 (31%) 53 (73%) 44% 192 (32%) 54 (70%) 43% 0.54
Enjoyable 204 (42%) 56 (77%) 51% 275 (46%) 59 (77%) 56% 0.08
Neutral 98 (20%) 34 (47%) 42% 82 (14%) 31 (40%) 34% 0.02
Rushed 16 (3%) 11 (15%) 19% 27 (5%) 15 (19%) 28% 0.98
Chaotic 14 (3%) 5 (7%) 38% 7 (1%) 6 (8%) 13% 0.06
Tense 6 (1%) 6 (8%) 16% 9 (2%) 7 (9%) 16% 0.94
a.

Overall tabulations count the frequency of response at the sample population level. For example, of the overweight participants' 488 snacking occasions, 53% (N=258) were prepared by the parent or partner.

b.

Between tabulations compute the fraction of the participants in the weight status stratified sample (N=73 overweight and N=77 nonoverweight participants) who reported a response at least once for the respective snacking occasion. For example, 58 overweight participants (79%) had at least one snacking occasion in which the parent or partner prepared the snack, which means that 15 overweight participants never had a snack prepared by a parent/partner over the course of the study. Only 6 overweight participants had at least one snack that they considered to be a tense atmosphere.

c.

Within-participant statistics report the fraction of the time that participants reported the same snacking characteristic over multiple occasions. For example, the most frequent response about the snacking atmosphere among participants with girls was “enjoyable” (42%) and 77% of the stratified overweight sample (N=56) reported the snacking characteristic at least once. Of the 56 overweight participant who had an “enjoyable” snacking occasion, they reported the same response about other snacking occasions 51% of the time -- about 1 in every 2 snacks.

d.

Response values were dummy coded to test if the probability of the snacking response differed between boys and girls. Meal occasions were restricted to snacks and generalized estimating equation models were fitted to account for repeated observations and adjusted for parent and child sex, child age and race/ethnicity, household structure (e.g., single parent with/without other adults and multiple parents with/without other adults) and reported annual household income.