Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 28;43(7):2089–2108. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25784

TABLE 3.

Evaluation of WMH segmentation on mild WMH cases

HyperMapper baseline HyperMapper Bayesian BIANCA DeepMedic
Dice similarity coefficient 0.841 (±0.097) 0.842 (±0.097) 0.340 (±0.067) 0.779 (±0.092)
Hausdorff distance (HD95) (mm) ↓ 5.365 (±6.450) 5.252 (±6.505) 44.042 (±9.564) 8.236 (±7.190)
Absolute volume difference (%) ↓ 11.298 (±12.715) 11.393 (±12.812) 275.970 (±324.757) 22.087 (±20.971)
Sensitivity (recall) 0.712 (±0.161) 0.712 (±0.160) 0.780 (±0.187) 0.749 (±0.160)
F‐1 score 0.720 (±0.116) 0.721 (±0.116) 0.096 (±0.048) 0.594 (±0.120)

Note: ↓ indicates that smaller values represent better performance.

Values in bold indicate best performance.

Abbreviation: WMH, white matter hyperintensity.