Table 2.
Model 1a | Model 2a | Δ ELPDb | s.e. Δ ELPD | z-score | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Education (SNPs=3733) | |||||
Null | Sharing | −120.0 | 13 | −8.7 | 2.0e−18 |
Null | Causal | −120.0 | 14 | −8.6 | 3.0e−18 |
Sharing | Causal | −7.3 | 1.2 | −6.2 | 2.1e−10 |
Income (SNPs =73) | |||||
Null | Sharing | −3.6 | 1.5 | −2.5 | 0.007 |
Null | Causal | −9.7 | 3.4 | −2.9 | 0.0022 |
Sharing | Causal | −6.1 | 2.1 | −3.0 | 0.0015 |
TDI (SNPs =27) | |||||
Null | Sharing | −0.31 | 0.45 | −0.70 | 0.24 |
Null | Causal | −1.60 | 2.2 | −0.74 | 0.23 |
Sharing | Causal | −1.30 | 1.8 | −0.73 | 0.23 |
Intelligence (SNPs=2945) | |||||
Null | Sharing | −25.0 | 5.7 | −4.4 | 5.5e−06 |
Null | Causal | −31.0 | 7.1 | −4.4 | 5.2e−06 |
Sharing | Causal | −5.9 | 1.4 | −4.1 | 1.8e−05 |
aModel 1 and Model 2 refer to the models being compared (null, sharing, or causal)
bModel fit is measured by Δ Expected Log Pointwise Posterior Density (ELPD); Negative values indicate that model 2 is a better fit