Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 29;61(4):1699–1708. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab520

Table 3.

Longitudinal decline in AC and ceramide component scores following treatment

Baseline AC analysis Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 5 Patient 6 Patient 7a
Baseline ceramide analysis Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 5 Patient 6 Patient 7a
Months to longitudinal sampling 8.0 5.5 3.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 8.0
Baseline sample score 0.117 0.410 1.743 2.236 0.894 −−0.322 −0.370
Follow-up sample score −0.937 −1.264 −1.315 −0.890 −0.500 0.058 −0.457
Months to longitudinal sampling 8.0 5.5 2.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 8.0
Baseline −0.652 −0.505 1.542 1.140 −0.592 −0.152 1.721
Follow-up −0.706 −1.746 0.266 −0.487 −1.256 −0.332 −0.298

In baseline analysis of the AC data (Table 2), 12 AC concentrations were significantly greater in the TN group. In longitudinal analyses, a single PCA-derived factor explaining 51% of the variation in these ACs decreased by 1.43 .s.d. (P= 0.03) during treatment. Mean decline of −1.43 s.d. (P = 0.03).

Baseline ceramide analysis revealed three of four concentrations higher in the TN group at baseline (C24:1, d18-1-C18 and d18-1-C24-1). These loaded on a single PCA-derived factor. In longitudinal analyses, this factor, which explained 78% of the variance, decreased by 0.98 s.d. (P < 0.01) during treatment. Mean decline of −0.97 s.d. (P < 0.01).

a

Flare patient.