Table 3.
Baseline AC analysis | Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | Patient 5 | Patient 6 | Patient 7a |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline ceramide analysis | Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | Patient 5 | Patient 6 | Patient 7a |
Months to longitudinal sampling | 8.0 | 5.5 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 |
Baseline sample score | 0.117 | 0.410 | 1.743 | 2.236 | 0.894 | −−0.322 | −0.370 |
Follow-up sample score | −0.937 | −1.264 | −1.315 | −0.890 | −0.500 | 0.058 | −0.457 |
Months to longitudinal sampling | 8.0 | 5.5 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 |
Baseline | −0.652 | −0.505 | 1.542 | 1.140 | −0.592 | −0.152 | 1.721 |
Follow-up | −0.706 | −1.746 | 0.266 | −0.487 | −1.256 | −0.332 | −0.298 |
In baseline analysis of the AC data (Table 2), 12 AC concentrations were significantly greater in the TN group. In longitudinal analyses, a single PCA-derived factor explaining 51% of the variation in these ACs decreased by 1.43 .s.d. (P = 0.03) during treatment. Mean decline of −1.43 s.d. (P = 0.03).
Baseline ceramide analysis revealed three of four concentrations higher in the TN group at baseline (C24:1, d18-1-C18 and d18-1-C24-1). These loaded on a single PCA-derived factor. In longitudinal analyses, this factor, which explained 78% of the variance, decreased by 0.98 s.d. (P < 0.01) during treatment. Mean decline of −0.97 s.d. (P < 0.01).
Flare patient.