Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 15;10(3):731–746. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00052

Table 5.

Post-hoc slope tests in examining the difference between significant slopes

FCV-19S SABAS BSMAS IGDS
Group 1
High −0.204 (0.140), P = 0.15 −0.034 (0.095), P = 0.72 0.034 (0.063), P = 0.59
Low −0.807 (0.128), P < 0.01** −0.319 (0.081), P < 0.01** −0.219 (0.063), P < 0.01**
Group 2
High −0.014 (0.126), P = 0.91 0.245 (0.098), P = 0.01* 0.180 (0.089), P = 0.04*
Low −0.384 (0.116), P < 0.01** 0.034 (0.086), P = 0.69 −0.081 (0.067), P = 0.22
Group 3
High 1.093 (0.422), P = 0.01* a a
Low 1.208 (0.289), P < 0.01** a a
All participants
High 0.008 (0.092), P = 0.98 0.119 (0.071), P = 0.09 0.149 (0.059), P = 0.01*
Low −0.493 (0.083), P < 0.01** −0.119 (0.063), P = 0.04* −0.101 (0.048), P = 0.03*

a Post-hoc slope tests were not performed due to the nonsignificant interaction effects (Please see Table 4).