Table 4.
The moderating effect of exercise type between physical activity and MPA
| Outcome | Predictors | β | t | Lower CI | Upper CI |
| MPA | Gender | 0.271 | 2.41* | 0.050 | 0.491 |
| Major | −0.169 | −1.99* | −0.335 | −0.002 | |
| PA | −0.266 | −3.85*** | −0.401 | −0.130 | |
| W1 | 0.263 | 2.04* | 0.010 | 0.516 | |
| W2 | 0.445 | 2.44* | 0.087 | 0.802 | |
| W3 | 0.059 | 0.55 | −0.153 | 0.272 | |
| PA × W1 | 0.397 | 2.92** | 0.131 | 0.664 | |
| PA × W2 | 0.276 | 2.22* | 0.032 | 0.519 | |
| PA × W3 | 0.202 | 1.97 | −0.001 | 0.405 | |
| Model fit index | R 2 | 0.064 | |||
| F (9.598) | 4.577*** | ||||
Note: MPA, mobile phone addiction; PA, physical activity; the reference group, aerobic endurance programs (n = 364); W1, separated net programs (n = 63); W2, confrontation programs (n = 70); W3, difficulty beauty programs (n = 111); Lower CI, lower-level confidence interval; Upper CI, upper-level confidence interval; β = standardized coefficient.* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.