Table 3.
RC Rat-Only Weight Regression WJSC (mg/kg) |
RC Rat-Only Millimole Regression WJSC (mg/kg) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemicals | Hazard Category | RC Rodent (mg/kg) | MTS | NRU | MTS | MTS | NRU | MTS |
2D | 3D | 2D | 3D | |||||
Mercury(II) chloride | 1 | 1 | 308 U | 233 U | 302 U | 343 U | 246 U | 335 U |
Cycloheximide | 1 | 2 | 38 U | 15 U | - | 29 U | 10 U | - |
Sodium
arsenite |
2 | 41 | 139 U | 126 U | 139 U | 88 U | 78 U | 89 U |
Sodium dichromate dihydrate | 2 | 50 | 72 U | 32 | 111 U | 65 U | 25 | 108 U |
Cadmium(II) chloride | 3 | 88 | 164 (105) * | 356 U | - | 135 (77) * | 326 U | - |
Sodium
fluoride |
3 | 180 | 419 U (274) * | 379 U | 361 U | 173 (105) * | 154 | 145 |
Propranolol hydrochloride | 4 | 470 | 488 | 500 | 575 | 619 | 636 | 751 |
Atropine sulfate monohydrate | 4 | 639 | 1593 | 1373 | - | 4033 U | 2416 U | - |
Potassium chloride | 5 | 2602 | 2976 | 2981 | 2575 | 2411 | 3386 | 2033 |
Trichloroacetic acid | 5 | 4999 | 1637 O | 1344 O | - | 1849 O | 1466 O | - |
Sodium hypochlorite | 6 | 10,328 | 1140 O | 945 O | 1110 O | 777 O | 622 O | 753 O |
Glycerol | 6 | 12,691 | 6401 | 6343 | - | 6702 | 6301 | - |
Correct prediction score (%) ** |
N = 12 | 5/12 (41.7) [6/12 (50)] * |
5/12 (41.7) | - | 5/12 (41.7) [5/12 (41.7)] * |
5/12 (41.7) | - | |
N = 7 | 2/7 (29) 3/7 (42.9) |
- | 2/7 (29) | 3/7 (42.9) | - | 3/7 (42.9) | ||
% Prediction improvement | N = 12 | +9/+17 | +9/+17 | - | +9/+0 | +9/+0 | - |
U = underprediction (underestimation of toxicity); O = overprediction (overestimation of toxicity). Chemicals in bold = correct prediction of toxicity class by both regression types (weight/millimole). The 7 chemicals in italics are those selected for confined group analysis based on N = 7 chemicals (one per hazard class; two from class 2) in 2D or 3D culture conditions. * Bracketed data represent predicted LD50 values and correct prediction scores resulting from in vitro (2D or 3D) toxicity evaluation in serum-free conditions, using the MTS assay. ** Prediction scores for BALB/c 3T3 and NHK cells (ICCVAM validation study) were 33.3/25% and 33.3/41.7% for the RC-rat only weight and millimole regressions, respectively; % prediction improvement was compared to the available in silico data from the NRU assay for BALB/c 3T3 and NHK cells, respectively.