Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 28;19(7):4010. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074010

Table 4.

Evaluation of effects of the intervention for youth participants.

Change Over Time
Variable Pre-Test Post-Test Post-Test–Pre-Test Mean (p-Value)
Perceived competency
Control 20.36 (0.336) 20.48 (0.344) 0.11 (0.722)
Treatment 20.14 (0.333) 21.98 (0.336) 1.84 (<0.0001)
T–C difference (p-value) −0.22 (0.613) 1.50 (0.001) −1.72 (0.0002)
Attitudes toward older people
Control 25.34 (0.522) 26.44 (0.538) 1.10 (0.061)
Treatement 23.87 (0.518) 28.70 (0.523) 4.84 (<0.0001)
T–C difference (p-value) 1.47 (0.040) 2.27 (0.002) −3.73 (<0.0001)
Interest in working with older people
Control 22.38 (0.436) 22.65 (0.446) 0.27 (0.403)
Treatement 22.33 (0.432) 24.19 (0.435) 1.86 (0.405)
T–C difference (p-value) −0.05 (0.927) 1.54 (0.009) −1.59 (0.007)
Purpose
Control 24.19 (0.554) 24.23 (0.560) 0.04 (0.927)
Treatement 24.77 (0.546) 25.97 (0.551) 1.21 (0.005)
T–C difference (p-value) 0.58 (0.406) 1.75 (0.014) −1.17 (0.053)
Self-esteem
Control 16.51 (0.354) 17.21 (0.362) 0.70 (0.034)
Treatement 16.35 (0.351) 17.65 (0.356) 1.30 (0.0002)
T–C difference (p-value) −0.16 (0.725) 0.44 (0.355) −0.60 (0.196)

Note: Table entries are means (SEs) in the 2 × 2 (treatment × time) upper left quadrant for each dependent variable and mean differences (Ps) in the other three quadrants. The entries in the bottom right cell for each dependent variable represent the tests of treatment effects. The model for each outcome also includes gender and grade level (middle school-aged versus high school-aged students) as additional fixed classification factors, and individuals as levels of a random classification factor.