Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 25;11(7):1114. doi: 10.3390/cells11071114

Table 1.

Properties of action potential and diastolic depolarization in Cav1.2DHP−/− SANC.

Firing Cav1.2DHP−/− SANC (n = 21) Responder Dormant Cav1.2DHP−/− SANC (n = 12)
Baseline ISO ISO + Nife Baseline ISO ISO + Nife
Frequency (AP·min−1) 197 ± 22 401 ± 15 **** 176 ± 30 $$$$ NA 320 ± 46 49 ± 31
MDP
(mV)
−59.8 ± 1.5 −60.3 ± 1.4 −61.7 ± 1.6 NA −53.4 ± 2 −59.9 ± 3.3
Linear slope
(mV·ms−1)
0.042 ± 0.005 0.092 ± 0.009 *** 0.053 ± 0.004 $$$ NA 0.080 ± 0.008 0.079 ± 0.005
Expo slope
(mV·ms−1)
0.317 ± 0.019 0.596 ± 0.042 **** 0.340 ± 0.018 $$$$ NA 0.452 ± 0.046 0.411 ± 0.012
AP threshold
(mV)
−43.7 ± 1.5 −42.2 ± 1.5 * −41.7 ± 1.7 NA −30.1 ± 2.5 −34.9 ± 2.8
Upstroke
(mV·ms−1)
13.9 ± 2.8 13.3 ± 2.6 13.4 ± 2.8 NA 6.1 ± 2.9 5.4 ± 0.3
AP amplitude
(mV)
82.3 ± 2.9 85.9 ± 3.3 89.1 ± 4 NA 68.3 ± 4 84.1 ± 7.1
AP duration
(ms)
133.6 ± 4.4 108.9 ± 3.5 **** 111.4 ± 4.3 NA 117.1 ± 9.1 105.2 ± 15.1
Coefficient of
variation
0.42 ± 0.12 0.06 ± 0.01 **** 0.47 ± 0.15 $$$ NA 0.43 ± 0.22 1.11 ± 0.67

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; MDP, maximum diastolic potential; NA, not applicable. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs. firing SANC at baseline control by one-way ANOVA (parametric) or Friedman test (non-parametric). $$$ p < 0.001, $$$$ p < 0.0001 vs. firing SANC under ISO perfusion by one-way ANOVA (parametric) or Friedman test (non-parametric). Only n = 3 dormant SANC did not stop under ISO + Nife condition, hence no statistical analysis was performed.