Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 26;19(7):3964. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073964

Table 3.

Selected indicators to compare samples of sanitation projects.

Indicator Description Options Score References
A Processing time (working days) ≥361 1 [36]
271–360 2
181–270 3
91–180 4
1–90 5
B Description of the influence area No information 1 [36]
Information not justified 2
General information only 3
Moderately justified information 4
Detailed and justified information 5
C Methodology to identify and evaluate environmental impacts Yes 2 [29,36]
No 1
D Use of reference international regulations Yes 2 [29,36]
No 1
E Existence of mitigation measures Yes 2 [26,36]
No 1
F Existence of compensation measures Yes 2 [26,36]
No 1
G Existence of repair measures Yes 2 [26,36]
No 1
H Identification of contingency and emergency measures Yes 2 [26,36]
No 1
I Consultation and participation Yes 2 [24,26,27,36]
No 1
J Appeal after project approval or rejection Yes 2 [26,36]
No 1
K Public information after the environmental license is obtained Yes 2 [32]
No 1
L Post-auditing No information about supervision or Unsupervised project 1 [28,29]
Project without non-compliance 2
Breach of the environmental license or Sector Permits 3
M Punishment for non-compliance No information 1 [28,29]
Project without infraction 2
No classified or minor infraction 3
Serious infraction 4
Very serious infraction 5
N Investment (MUSD) 0–0.5 1
>0.5–1 2
>1–10 3
>10–100 4
>100 5