Table 3.
Model | n | Baseline Depressed | Follow-Up Depressed | Incident Cases of Depression over Follow-Up a | Reduced Cases of Depression over Follow-Up b | % Change in the Prevalence of Depression c | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income only | 17,874 | 6154 | 5974 | 0 | 180 | 2.92 | 0.005 |
Income + presence of social networks | 17,873 | 6154 | 6022 | 0 | 132 | 2.14 | 0.038 |
Income + reduced depressed persons in the social networks | 17,882 | 6157 | 6944 | 838 | 51 | −12.78 | <0.001 |
Income + increase in social networks | 17,865 | 6151 | 3318 | 0 | 2833 | 46.06 | <0.001 |
Income + reduced depressed persons in the social networks + increase in social networks | 17,863 | 6150 | 4744 | 24 | 1430 | 22.86 | <0.001 |
Reduced depressed persons in the social networks | 17,879 | 6156 | 7062 | 906 | 0 | −14.72 | <0.001 |
Reduced depressed persons in the social networks + increase in social networks | 17,881 | 6157 | 4880 | 18 | 1295 | 20.74 | <0.001 |
Increase in social networks | 17,862 | 6150 | 3508 | 0 | 2642 | 42.96 | <0.001 |
a Number of new cases of depression predicted by the simulation; b number of cases of depression reduced from baseline predicted by the simulation; c % change in the prevalence of depression from baseline to follow-up predicted by the simulation.