Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 26;23(7):3651. doi: 10.3390/ijms23073651

Table 1.

Main clinical trials evaluating cardiovascular outcomes among patients treated with SGLT2-Is.

Drug Trial
(Ref.)
Patients Follow-Up
(Median)
Outcomes Hazard Ratio
(95% CI)
Empagliflozin EMPAREG OUTCOME study [47] 7020 T2DM patients at high risk for CV events and an eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 3.1 years
(2.6 years of treatment)
composite of death from CV causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke 0.86 (0.74–0.99)
empagliflozin 10 mg vs.
empagliflozin 25 mg vs. 
matching placebo 
death from cardiovascular causes
nonfatal myocardial infarction
nonfatal stroke
0.62 (0.49–0.77)
0.87 (0.70–1.09)
1.24 (0.92–1.56)
hospitalization for heart failure 0.65 (0.50–0.85)
death from any cause  0.68 (0.57–0.82)
EMPEROR-Reduced [101] 3730 diabetic or not diabetic patients with class II, III, or IV HF and EF ≤ 40%  16 months cardiovascular death or hospitalization for worsening heart failure 0.75 (0.65–0.86)
empagliflozin 10 mg vs. placebo 
(in addition to recommended therapy)
hospitalization for heart failure 0.70 (0.58–0.85)
EMPEROR-Preserved [114] 26.2 months cardiovascular death or hospitalization for worsening heart failure 0.79 (0.69–0.90)
5988 diabetic or not diabetic patients with class II-IV HF and EF > 40% hospitalization for heart failure 0.73 (0.61–0.88)
empagliflozin 10 mg vs. placebo 
(in addition to usual therapy)
EMPERIAL [104] 12 weeks change in 6-minute walk test distance  ns
patients with HFrE (EF ≤ 40%, n = 312) or with HFpEF (EF > 40%, n = 315) KCCQ-TSS (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Total Symptom Score) ns
  empagliflozin 10 mg vs. placebo   CHQ-SAS (Chronic Heart Failure Questionnaire Self-Administered Standardized format) dyspnoea score ns
Canagliflozin CANVAS study [46] 10,142 participants with T2DM and high CV risk
100 mg (with an optional increase to 300 mg) vs. placebo 
188.2 weeks composite of death from CV causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke 0.86 (0.75–0.97)
Dapagliflozin DECLARE-TIMI 58 [48] 17,160 T2DM patients at high risk for CV events (only 7% of patients had an eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) 4.2 years composite of CV death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke 0.93 (0.84–1.03)
dapagliflozin 10 mg vs. placebo  CV death or hospitalization for HF  0.83 (0.73–0.95)
hospitalization for HF 0.73 (0.61–0.88)
DAPA-HF Trial [100] 4304 diabetic (68%) or not diabetic patients with class II-IV HF  18.2 months worsening HF (hospitalization or urgent visit resulting in IV therapy for HF) or CV death 0.74 (0.65–0.85)
dapagliflozin 10 mg vs. placebo first worsening HF event 0.70 (0.59–0.83)
(in addition to recommended therapy) CV death 0.83 (0.71–0.97)
DEFINE HF [103] 263 diabetic or not diabetic patient with class II-III HF 12 weeks mean NT-proBNP ns
dapagliflozin 10 mg vs. placebo % of patients with ameliorated functional status 1.8 (1.03–3.06)
Sotagliflozin SCORED [93] 10,584 T2DM patients with CKD and CV risk
sotagliflozin 200–400 mg vs. placebo
16 months composite of CV death, hospitalization fo HF, and urgent visit for HF 0.74 (0.63–0.88)
SOLOIST-WHF [102] 1222 T2DM patients recently hospitalized for worsening HF
sotagliflozin 200–400 mg vs. placebo
9 months CV deaths and hospitalization or urgent visits for HF 0.67 (0.52–0.85)
CV death 0.84 (0.58–1.22)
  death from any cause 0.82 (0.59–1.14)
Ertugliflozin VERTIS CV study [92] 8246 T2DM patients with established CV disease and an eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/ 1.73 m2 3 years composite of CV death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke 0.97 (0.85–1.11)
ertugliflozin 5 or 15 mg vs. placebo  death from CV causes or hospitalization for HF 0.88 (0.75–1.03)
death from CV causes 0.92 (0.77–1.11)