Table 1.
Study | Item | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Total | |
Aune et al. 2018 [20] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Guillot et al. 2019 [21] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Hodgson et al. 2018 [22] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Ikutomo et al. 2020 [28] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Junker & Stöggl, 2015 [24] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
Junker & Stöggl, 2019 [23] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Kiyono et al. 2020 [25] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
Morton et al. 2016 [26] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Smith et al. 2019 [27] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
Item 1: Eligibility criteria; Item 2: Random allocation of subjects; Item 3: Allocation concealment; Item 4: Similarity of intervention groups; Item 5: Blinding of subjects; Item 6: Blinding of intervention trainers; Item 7: Blinding of assessors; Item 8: 85% of the subjects initially allocated completed at least one key outcome; Item 9: All subjects received treatment or control with an “intention to treat”analysis performed; Item 10: Between group comparison executed for at least one variable; and Item 11: Study provides both point measures and measures of variability for at least one key outcome.