Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 31;23(7):3885. doi: 10.3390/ijms23073885

Table 5.

Temperature responses of leaf hydraulic parameters under two N supplies at different growth stages.

Growth Stage N Supply Leaf Temperature (°C) Ψleaf (MPa) Kleaf
(mmol m−2 s−1 MPa−1)
Mid-tillering N0 15 −0.293 ± 0.087 a 8.57 ± 1.11 a
25 −0.285 ± 0.090 a 7.86 ± 1.80 a
35 −0.423 ± 0.097 b 7.05 ± 1.56 a
HN 15 −0.360 ± 0.099 a 11.39 ± 2.53 a
25 −0.430 ± 0.114 a 10.71 ± 1.45 a
35 −0.370 ± 0.106 a 10.13 ± 2.58 a
Booting N0 15 −0.155 ± 0.064 a 7.48 ± 2.25 a
25 −0.278 ± 0.068 b 5.98 ± 1.78 a
35 −0.560 ± 0.140 c 6.03 ± 1.55 a
HN 15 −0.395 ± 0.137 a 8.83 ± 1.16 a
25 −0.310 ± 0.081 a 9.20 ± 2.17 a
35 −0.425 ± 0.044 a 9.59 ± 1.38 a
ANOVA
T *** ns
N ns ***
S ns **
T × N *** ns
T × S * ns
N × S ns ns

Data are means ± SD of 4–7 replicates. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ns, non-significant. S represents growth stage. Ψleaf, leaf water potential; Kleaf, the normalised leaf hydraulic conductance with water viscosity. The data followed by different letters in the same N and growth stages are significant at p < 0.05 level.