Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 5;11(7):2037. doi: 10.3390/jcm11072037

Table 1.

Comparison of percent of participants with certain demographic characteristics in pwMS (n = 87), all control subjects (n = 216) and a subsampled control group (n = 134).

Variable Category pwMS All Control Subjects Control Group pwMS—Control Group Comparison
Gender Women 81.6 50.5 81.3 χ2(1) = 0.002
p = 0.960
Men 18.4 49.5 18.7
Right hand dominance Yes 93.1 90.7 93.3 χ2(1) = 0.004
p = 0.951
No 5.7 8.8 6
Education Primary school 3.4 2.8 3 χ2(3) = 5.453
p = 0.141
High school 65.5 60.2 51.5
Undergraduate study 9.2 10.2 11.2
Graduate study 20.7 26.9 34.3
Marriage status Single 21.8 22.2 20.9 χ2(3) = 3.282
p = 0.350
Marriage/cohabitation 63.2 68.1 71.6
Divorced/separated 10.3 7.5 4.5
Widow(er) 3.4 2.3 3
Working status Student 6.9 6 6.7 χ2(7) = 52.819
p < 0.001
Employee 32.2 76.9 76.1
Unemployed 18.4 7.9 9.7
Temporary sick leave 6.9 0.5 0.7
Permanent incapacity for work 5.7 0 0
A person who runs the household 3.4 0 0
Disability pension 23 8.3 6.7
Other 2.3 0.5 0
Comorbidity No 64.4 80.1 78.4 χ2(1) = 4.663
p = 0.031
Yes 28.7 15.3 17.2
Age M (SD) 42.57 (12.2) 43.8 (12.632) 43.78 (12.749) t(219) = 0.700
p = 0.484
Range 19–73 18–81 22–73

Note. Comparisons between pwMS and all control subjects are not presented—they were of the same significance as between pwMS and the control group, except for gender, which had significantly different proportions due to the expected ratio of male to female MS patients in the general population.