Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 26;11(7):1848. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071848

Table 4.

Results of Pentacam and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) analysis in subjects with monoclonal gammopathy (MG) and controls in previous studies [41,42,43,54] and in our present study. n.a.: not analysed; MGUS: monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance.

Author, Year Number of Eyes (MG/Controls) Pentacam; Corneal Stromal Light Scattering Pentacam; Analysed Annular Zones IVCM; Stromal Hyperreflective Keratocytes IVCM; Stromal Matrix Hyperreflectivity IVCM; Stromal Hyperreflective Spikes
Aragona et al., 2016 [54] 62/40 n.a. n.a. decreased (in neoplastic patients, compared to controls and MGUS) increased n.a.
Enders et al., 2017 [41] 10/26 increased 0–12 mm n.a. n.a. n.a.
Busch et al., 2017 [42] 20/10 increased 0–6 mm n.a. n.a. n.a.
Ichii et al., 2019 [43] 60/64 increased 0–6 mm n.a. n.a. n.a.
Present study 130/100 increased 0–12 mm increased n.a. Increased