Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 6;23(7):4055. doi: 10.3390/ijms23074055

Table 1.

External/Applied/Mechanic Forces in GBM.

Author Stress Marker Study Design Effect on GBM
Stiffness Chen et al. [6] Piezo/PIEZO1 Drosophilia glioma model in vivo; mice xenograft experiments; RNA sequencing of two human GBM stem cell lines (G508 and G532) Regulator of mitosis and tissue stiffness through activation of integrin-FAK signaling; correlated with GBM aggressiveness and decreased survival
Miroshnikova et al. [7] Tenascin C Patient-derived samples; mouse model ECM stiffness represses miR-203 expression which activates HIF1α-dependent TNC deposition, which may induce aggressiveness and lead to recurrence
Sen et al. [8] Talin-1 U373 MG human glioma cells Involved in mechanical rigidity sensing; transmits signals from the ECM to the cytoskeleton through interplay of integrins and actin
Khan et al. [9] N/A CD 133+ GBM cells Actively migrating GBMs exhibit higher elastic stiffness at the front end, facilitating traction needed for forward movement through an anchoring effect
Tensile Force Barnes et al. [10] Tension (tenescin) Patient-derived samples; mouse model Tension-mediated glycocalyx–integrin feedback loop which promotes mesenchymal characteritistics
Shen et al. [2] Yes-associated protein (YAP) G55 GBM cells Re-localization of YAP to the cell nucleus indicates a higher degree of cytoskeletal tension during migration of GBM cells in a physically confined environment
Traction de Semir et al. [11] Pleckstrin homology domain-interacting protein (PHIP) In vitro and in vivo murine model of U-251 GBM cell lines Plays a role in activating the actin cytoskeleton, focal adhesion dynamics, migration, and invasion
Gordon et al. [12] Latex beads displacement and cell line volumetric growth In vitro using human U87MGmEGFR
GBM cell line
Demonstrated that tumor cells will grow towards the path of least resistance through traction-mediated forces
Drag Force Agosti et al. [13] N/A U87 GBM cell lines During proliferation, GBM aggregation is enabled when the adhesive force between cells is of the same magnitude of the drag forces of cells as they expand
Compression Voutouri et al. [14] Vessel option Mathematical model Compression led to hypoxia and resultant angiogenesis
Calhoun et al. [15] miR548 family LN229 and U251 GBM cell lines; pathway analysis Increased migration and decreased proliferation, characteristics associated with tumor aggressiveness
Demou et al. [16] Caveolin-1, integrin-β1, Rac1 U87 and HGL21 GBM cells Cell deformation/compression leads to downregulation of E-cadherin (CDH1) and PECAM-1 (CD31) and overexpression of PTEN and Rac1; resultant decrease in cell adhesion and increased migration
Adhesion Morjen et al. [17] Kunitz-typeprotease inhibitor (PIVL) In vitro using U87 cell lines; in vivo mouse model Disrupted GBM migration, invasion, and adhesion through inhibition of integrin
Yao et al. [18] P311/PTZ17 In vivo mouse model Rho GTPase-mediated promotion of migration of epidermal stem cells
Hydrostatic Pressure Claus et al. [19] N/A Case report Increased CSF protein concentration caused increased ICP and patient deterioration
Takara et al. [20] N/A Case report Increased CSF protein concentration led to hydrostatic pressure build up
Zoi et al. Polycystin-1 (PC1) T98G GBM cells subjected to coninuous hydrostatic pressure and/or PC1 blockade Hydrostatic pressure inhibited proliferation and migration of GBM cells. PC1 had the opposite effect
Magnetic Force Perez et al. [21] N/A (U87) tumor spheroid aggregation methodology based on magnetic cell labeling; spheroid cell invasion w/ Matrigel Magnetic properties of the spheroids allow for determination of surface tension
Chen et al. [22] Hexagonal superparamagnetic cones U-343 GBM cell lines Magnetic field gradient
decreased cell growth and migration
Osmotic Pressure Catacuzzeno et al. [23] Swelling-activated chloride currents In vitro using GL-15 GBM cells Channel activation included shape and volume changes, allowing migration and invasion
Pu et al. [24] Caveolin-1, CAVIN1; uPA and MMPs; AQP1 U87, U118, and U251 GBM cell lines Play a role in the response to increased pressure and GBM invasion
Pu et al. [25] Snail-1, Snail-2, N-cadherin, Twist, and vimentin GBM cell lines U87 and U251; patient-derived neural oncospheres EMT and invasion through production of matrix proteases as a response to osmotic/hydrostatic pressure
Shear Stress Rezk et al. [26] Nestin and vimentin; actin filaments, vinculin, paxillin, and FAK Patient-derived samples Increased migration and proliferation
Solid Stress Ciarletta et al. [27] N/A Theoretical calculation of buckling instability from solid stresses Residual stresses promote buckling instability and promote tumor invasion
Stylianopoulos et al. [28] Collagen, hyaluronan Mathematical model Increased perfusion of tumors led to improved oxygenation and drug delivery

N/A: Not applicable.