Table 6.
Model | Alcohol consumptiona | BMIa | Exerciseb | Healthy eating indexa | Smokingb | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | |
Model 1 | − .08 | < .001 | − .07 | .002 | .15 | .007 | .14 | < .001 | − .29 | < .001 |
Model 2 | − .06 | .007 | − .04 | .055 | .12 | .035 | .09 | < .001 | − .23 | .001 |
Model 3 | − .06 | .024 | − .04 | .157 | .09 | .163 | .07 | .003 | − .17 | .027 |
N = 1800. β = standardized slope coefficient.
Bolded p values indicate significance at the .05 level. Model 1 was an unadjusted model with dispositional gratitude as the only predictor without entering any other covariates. Model 2 additionally controlled for age, sex, education attainment, household income, race, and the use of hyperlipidemic agent medication. Model 3 additionally controlled for dispositional optimism, agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, emotional stability, and openness to experience.
aLinear regression. bLogistic regression.