Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 4:1–8. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.56

Table 2.

Description of how well medical school communicated with students by risk of developing depressive disorder (N = 212)

Total n (%) Average risk* n (%) At risk*
n (%)
p-valuea aOR (95% CI)b
Academic standard ratings during pandemic 0.007
Far below/ below standards 38 (17.9) 11 (29.0) 27 (71.0) 2.47 (0.97 −6.28)
Meets standards 126 (59.4) 69 (54.8) 57 (45.2) Reference
Above/ far above standards 48 (22.6) 29 (60.4) 19 (39.6) 0.70 (0.31 −1.59)
Communication about transition to online learning during pandemic 0.007
Very poor/ poor 29 (14.2) 11 (37.9) 18 (62.1) 0.83 (0.27 −2.54)
Fair 55 (26.8) 21 (38.2) 34 (61.8) Reference
Well/ very well 121 (59.0) 73 (60.3) 48 (39.7) 0.34 (0.15 −0.78)
Communication about how long medical school expected to utilize new learning methods 0.001
Very poor/ poor 65 (31.6) 24 (36.9) 41 (63.1) 1.77 (0.76 −4.12)
Fair 64 (31.1) 31 (48.4) 33 (51.6) Reference
Well/ very well 77 (37.4) 52 (67.5) 25 (32.5) 0.53 (0.23 −1.21)
Communication about test dates and times by administration 0.06
Very poor/ poor 32 (15.8) 12 (37.5) 20 (62.5) 0.95 (0.32 −2.88)
Fair 47 (23.2) 20 (42.6) 27 (57.5) Reference
Well/ very well 124 (61.1) 71 (68.9) 53 (42.7) 0.43 (0.19 −0.99)
Communication about summer research, practicums, or other curriculum 0.007
Very poor/ poor 51 (26.2) 17 (33.3) 34 (66.7) 1.97 (0.76 −5.10)
Fair 59 (30.3) 30 (50.8) 29 (49.2) Reference
Well/ very well 85 (43.6) 52 (61.2) 33 (38.8) 0.52 (0.23 −1.22)
Communication about return to classes in the Fall <0.001
Very poor/ poor 54 (27.0) 24 (44.4) 30 (55.6) 0.44 (0.16 −1.22)
Fair 51 (25.5) 14 (27.4) 37 (72.6) Reference
Well/ very well 95 (47.5) 62 (65.3) 33 (34.7) 0.21 (0.08 −0.52)
Communication of new or changing curriculum requirements <0.001
Very poor/ poor 47 (22.8) 16 (34.0) 31 (66.0) 0.78 (0.28 −2.18)
Fair 48 (23.3) 16 (33.3) 32 (66.7) Reference
Well/ very well 111 (53.9) 73 (65.8) 38 (34.2) 0.26 (0.11 −0.62)
Communication about delays or cancellations in national tests 0.04
Very poor/ poor 59 (35.1) 25 (42.4) 34 (57.6) 0.63 (0.22 −1.80)
Fair 37 (22.0) 15 (40.5) 22 (59.5) Reference
Well/ very well 72 (42.9) 44 (61.1) 28 (38.9) 0.46 (0.16 −1.29)
Communication of information about changes to school fees 0.005
Very poor/ poor 94 (48.7) 37 (39.4) 57 (60.6) 2.12 (0.87 −5.16)
Fair 43 (22.3) 28 (65.1) 15 (34.9) Reference
Well/ very well 56 (29.0) 34 (60.7) 22 (39.3) 0.86 (0.32 −2.34)
Communication about scholarships or other funding 0.001
Very poor/ poor 59 (33.0) 19 (32.2) 40 (67.8) 3.37 (1.30 −8.71)
Fair 53 (29.6) 30 (56.6) 23 (43.4) Reference
Well/ very well 67 (37.4) 43 (64.2) 24 (35.8) 0.55 (0.22 −1.39)
Communication about eligibility for CARES Act grant funds 0.3
Very poor/ poor 76 (41.3) 35 (46.1) 41 (54.0) 0.95 (0.37 −2.42)
Fair 41 (22.3) 19 (46.3) 22 (53.7) Reference
Well/ very well 67 (36.4) 39 (58.2) 28 (41.8) 0.75 (0.29 −1.94)

aOR= adjusted odds ratios; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval

*Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression, short-form (CESD-10), contained 10 questions with responses ranging from 0 to 3. The “average risk” score was < 10 and the “at risk” score was ≥ 10. This cutoff of depressive symptomology for this measure is established in the literature.

aChi-Square test p-value for unadjusted bivariate analyses.

baOR adjusted for year in medical school, change in coping, and change in depressive symptoms.

Bold odds ratios indicate significance at P < 0.05.