Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 29;13:850216. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.850216

Table 1.

Transcription factor, cis-acting elements, and the corresponding responsive genes that are involved in plant abiotic stress.

No TF families Cis-acting element (Core Sequence) Gene containing Cis-acting element Species Phenotypic changes in transgenic plant after induction of cold stress in comparison with wild type References
1 CBF/DREB DRE/CRT (A/GCCGAC) COR genes Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam) Slight wilting, lower damaged leaves, little changed in the photosynthetic efficiency in transgenic sweet potato Jin et al., 2017
2 NAC CATGTG Abiotic stress-responsive genes such as: RD26 Arabidopsis thaliana Slightly chlorotic leaves with a larger leaf blade and shorter petiole than the wild-type plants Nakashima et al., 2012
3 MYB Type I Myb recognition sequences CNGTT(A/G) or type II G(G/T)T(A/T)GTT(A/G) and type IIG G(G/T)T(A/T)GGT(A/G) Abiotic stress-responsive genes including COR genes Arabidopsis thaliana Induces darker green phenotypes in transgenic tobacco Enhances the contents of anthocyanins, phenolics, flavonoids, and soluble solids and, aroma volatiles in transgenic tomato Agarwal et al., 2006; Yang et al., 2021; Ma et al., 2022
4 WRKY W-box TTGACC/T RD29B/RD29A/COR6.6/DREB2A wild oat (Avena fatua) Higher survival rates, increases in proline, lower electrolyte leakage in transgenic cucumber Rushton et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2016
5 bHLH E-box (CANNTG) G-box (CACGTG) COR and anthocyanin biosynthetic genes Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam) Slight damage under cold stress and returned to a normal state after recovery treatment in transgenic sweet potato Jin et al., 2021; Shen et al., 2021
6 bZIP ABRE (PyACGTG/TC) RD29A, RD29B, COR15A, COR47 Arabidopsis thaliana Lower ion leakages and higher survival in transgenic Arabidopsis Wang et al., 2016
7 AP2 (ERF) GCC-box (AGCCGCC) Several abiotic stress-responsive genes Arabidopsis thaliana Greater survival rates of transgenic birch (Betula platyphylla) compared to wild type plant Zhu et al., 2010; Lv et al., 2020