Table 3.
Statistical Results Analysis of the Five Algorithms in Ordinary Environments in Case1.
| Performance Indicator | Statistics | Algorithm 1 | Algorithm 2 | Algorithm 3 | Algorithm 4 | Proposed Algorithm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planning time (s) | Best | 21.562 | 10.185 | 9.667 | 12.927 | 9.746 |
| Mean | 30.112 | 10.671 | 10.470 | 13.823 | 10.356 | |
| Worst | 37.608 | 11.145 | 11.293 | 14.773 | 11.106 | |
| Std. Dev. | 5.134 | 0.626 | 1.015 | 1.035 | 0.483 | |
| t-test | 2.1233 × 10−10 (+) | 0.779 | 4.7421 × 10−5 (+) | 5.7973 × 10−6 (+) | --- | |
| Planning length (m) | Best | 1677.354 | 1769.300 | 1695.650 | 1698.624 | 1669.643 |
| Mean | 1693.280 | 1812.457 | 1728.564 | 1708.821 | 1678.002 | |
| Worst | 1720.697 | 1855.835 | 1760.541 | 1721.100 | 1691.8235 | |
| Std. Dev. | 12.171 | 30.153 | 15.851 | 7.511 | 5.981 | |
| t-test | 0.000067 (+) | 8.5439 × 10−6 (+) | 6.8328 × 10−9 (+) | 5.8455 × 10−8 (+) | --- | |
| Number of inflection points | Best | 54.000 | 53.000 | 48.000 | 38.000 | 35.000 |
| Mean | 56.360 | 62.560 | 51.540 | 42.020 | 36.740 | |
| Worst | 59.000 | 79.000 | 56.000 | 44.000 | 38.000 | |
| Std. Dev. | 1.764 | 7.919 | 2.566 | 1.937 | 0.906 | |
| t-test | 4.7190 × 10−13 (+) | 6.9541 × 10−7 (+) | 2.7559 × 10−10 (+) | 3.3352 × 10−9 (+) | --- |